Posted on 09/21/2012 6:30:04 AM PDT by Wolfie
Folks in that condition should not be in possession of a firearm. Someone in the family should have made certain of it.
“Shooting to kill is appropriate “whenever you feel a threat on your own life or when you’re protecting someone else’s,” Hamilton said.”
I can argue with that, in that it predicates execution on the subjective state of mind of the police, whenever he FEELS threatened.
I would say shooting to kill is never appropriate, but somtimes justifiable when there is an overt, immediate threat to life.
Let us see who ends up owning the property after the the trial.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.