Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt Romney Releases Tax Return for 2011, Showing He Paid 14.1 Percent Tax Rate
Washington Post ^ | September 21, 2012 | Philip Rucker and Jia Lynn Yang,

Posted on 09/21/2012 4:52:26 PM PDT by lbryce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: lbryce

I have one question about Romney’s taxes.

Did he commit any crimes? No? End of discussion. If people do not like it, then hire politicians who will change it.

You get what you pay for. Or in the case of the 47%, you get what someone else pays for.


21 posted on 09/21/2012 6:36:22 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998

I get 3.5% on a fixed income 401K account and I don’t have anywhere near the money Romney has.


22 posted on 09/21/2012 6:36:32 PM PDT by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Consider yourself lucky.


23 posted on 09/21/2012 7:06:15 PM PDT by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt; maine-iac7

Please see post #19,20 Applies to the both of you as well.


24 posted on 09/21/2012 7:20:56 PM PDT by lbryce (BHO-"Now, I am become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds" by way of Oppenheimer at Trinity, NM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

If Mitt walked on water, tomorrow’s headlines would be, “Mitt Can’t Swim.”


25 posted on 09/21/2012 7:22:11 PM PDT by dfwgator (I'm voting for Ryan and that other guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
My take on the release of his tax returns, the tax rate he paid, from the perspective of most Americans is one that impacts on his electability to a negative, slightly negative degree.

That's been true of everything this campaign has done. They're making it too easy for the Obama camp and inviting the possibility, however slim, that they might actually lose against Obama in this economy.

26 posted on 09/21/2012 7:26:17 PM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tx_eggman

Post #19, 20 applying to you emphatically shows that you are the one not paying attention or are just merely incapable.


27 posted on 09/21/2012 7:40:51 PM PDT by lbryce (BHO-"Now, I am become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds" by way of Oppenheimer at Trinity, NM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998
3.6 million in interest? WOW Banks are only paying .25 percent.

30 year corporate bonds were yielding in the 5% range. If interest rates spike though, bond investors lose money should they decide to sell, because interest rate hikes result in lower bond prices.

28 posted on 09/21/2012 8:52:22 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Indeed. Thanks for sharing your insights, dear justiceseeker93!


29 posted on 09/21/2012 9:33:30 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

About the already been taxed thing, I don’t feel people fully understand the double tax laid on corporate profits. They tax it through the VAT the second before it gets into your hands, then through capital gains the second it falls in your hands. But somehow you’re said only to be paying the second part, and it is scandalously low to the ignorant (and tamely scandalous to Warren Buffet). The VAT tax generally lowers income for the righteous working man, too, less directly by removing the impetus for production. But upon capital gains it works directly, and the imps in Washington with all their wheels and pullies and gears within gears do so love our ignorance.


30 posted on 09/21/2012 9:34:57 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

“the original capital was already taxed”

True, and so was the profit, through the national VAT tax known as the corporate tax. Then it is taxed as “unearned income” (because surely minimum wage employees earn their keep whereas Romney loafed around all hus life/s). Then, of all the unmitigated gall, they tax it again when you die. Plus probably several times inbetween. As many times as they can get away with, and they can get away with it all.


31 posted on 09/21/2012 9:39:11 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Apparently I’m supposed to be more angry about what Romney does with his money than what Obama does with mine.


32 posted on 09/22/2012 8:03:42 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce; ncalburt; maine-iac7
Post #19, 20 applying to you emphatically shows that you are the one not paying attention or are just merely incapable.

You mean the post where you said:

I said from the perspective of most Americans

OK, I'll grant you that ... you did say most Americans. What I won't grant you is that you're actually paying attention ... as is evidenced by the very next words from that post ...

the amount Romney paid, being a billionaire and all

Mitt Romney, while being a very successful businessman, isn't anywhere near to being billionaire - although that's how Bambi and the MSM characterize him with their non-stop demonization of Billionaires and Millionaires. His net worth is in the neighborhood of $200 million - that's with an M, not a B.

So, Bryce, whether you like or not, I'll still be counting you among those I don't think are really paying attention.

33 posted on 09/22/2012 9:39:41 PM PDT by tx_eggman (Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

” You can bet that if there was anything in the returns even remotely suspicious of impropriety, the Obama IRS would have him audited as quickly as you could say “Mitt,” and the details of the audit would have been leaked (illegally) to their MSM pals. That’s just “politics as usual” in the current Regime, part of their SOP. “

When you can’t run on your record, toss innuendo to the leftist press.


34 posted on 09/24/2012 7:48:29 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson