Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does Ed Schultz Believe New Deal Emerged From US Experience in WWII?
NewsBusters ^

Posted on 09/21/2012 6:22:44 PM PDT by chessplayer

Here's Schultz on his radio show Wednesday, doing his part in the liberal media pile-on after Mitt Romney dared suggest considerable overlap between President Obama's supporters and those Americans most dependent on government (audio) --

In the video taken at the fundraiser that has leaked out, Romney claimed that 47 percent of Americans are Obama voters that pay no income tax, are dependent upon government and believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, you name it. Now, in a sense, he is correct, in the social safety net which we have believed in for generations. We're a compassionate country. We don't want to leave people behind. We've made sure that there is no suffering. We've tried to make sure that there's no suffering. And a lot of this comes from World War II. A lot of the policies that have propped up from the New Deal in the aftermath of the Second World War when we saw real pain, suffering, extermination in World War Two, it changed America for a number of generations and it changed how we did legislation, it changed what we wrote, what we believed in. And I do believe that the suffering of the Second World War pushed forward civil rights in this country, I do. You may disagree with me.

It's one thing for Schultz to get it wrong about Bill Clinton, claiming as he did earlier this month that Clinton was never tried in the Senate after he was impeached during the Lewinsky scandal. It's quite another for someone as boisterous in his braying for liberalism to get it wrong about the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt, liberals' patron saint.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
The kraut does it again.
1 posted on 09/21/2012 6:22:49 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Me thinks they protesth too much, looks like they got poked in a sore spot! Yet the more they prostest it, the more they advertize it.

Nice


2 posted on 09/21/2012 6:31:36 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer
Shinola won't polish a t___, but Schulz expends a lot of elbow grease, anyway, expecting his motion to confuse his public so they can't tell polish from excrement.
3 posted on 09/21/2012 6:37:31 PM PDT by oyez ( .Apparently The American brain has been reduced to the consistency of quicksand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Is the man that ignorant regarding US history or is this some purposeful rant?


4 posted on 09/21/2012 6:40:46 PM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Yes.

Except you want "and" instead of "or" in that question.

5 posted on 09/21/2012 6:44:47 PM PDT by SAJ (What is the next tagline some overweening mod will censor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Ed Schultz - really... this is guy is the worst kind of crybaby - he got booted from Cincinnati airwaves and cried about for days.

He must have about 3 people who listen to him, probably because they can’t figure out how to change channels.


6 posted on 09/21/2012 6:44:52 PM PDT by mike_9958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Reminds me of when Biden told of President Franklin D.Roosevelt addressing the nation over television in 1929—or John Kerry recounting how President Nixon sent him to Cambodia in 1968.


7 posted on 09/21/2012 6:47:19 PM PDT by Fiji Hill (Deo Vindice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Makes sense. Sgt Schultz came to the US after WWII along
with Col Hogan around the end of ‘45. He still was living
in the Fatherland when the New Deal was implemented
throughout most of the 1930s so it is understandable why
his timeline may be a little skewed.

“I see nussing, I know nussing” __Sgt Ed Schultz


8 posted on 09/21/2012 7:43:59 PM PDT by Sivad (Nor Cal Red Turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

Is the man that ignorant regarding US history or is this some purposeful rant?


I think he’s just trying to re-write history. Libs do that a lot.


9 posted on 09/21/2012 7:45:59 PM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sivad

I remember when the New Deal came into existence, and it wasn’t after the war, because Roosevelt died before the war ended in both Europe and the Pacific. It was in the 30s, if I remember correctly.


10 posted on 09/21/2012 8:12:46 PM PDT by MondoQueen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

I think Ed is referring to The Marshall Plan which rebuilt Europe after WW2. The New Deal, implemented in the first part of Roosevelts term was in the mid-1930’s. It was a complete failure in any event.


11 posted on 09/21/2012 8:57:44 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Hey Ed Shitz:

New Deal == Before WWII

New World Order == After WWII


12 posted on 09/21/2012 9:20:50 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MondoQueen

Yes, you are correct. The so-called New Deal was a feature of
the 1930s. The FDR fans have long falsely claimed that it pre-
vented the US from turning to socialism. Recent realists such
as Amity Slays (sp?) have written that the New Deal actually
extended the Great Depression and it was America’s entry into
WWII which snapped the nation out of its’ funk

In my previous post I was being a smart ass because I believe
that Ed Schultz is a world class jerk.


13 posted on 09/21/2012 10:54:04 PM PDT by Sivad (Nor Cal Red Turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John W

“Is the man that ignorant regarding US history or is this some purposeful rant?”

Consider his typical audience - you think they know or care?


14 posted on 09/21/2012 10:58:27 PM PDT by decal (I'm not rude, I don't suffer fools is all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Why would anyone on this site give a hoot what Schultz, Rhodes or Press has to say


15 posted on 09/22/2012 3:37:37 AM PDT by reefdiver (zer0 One and Done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson