Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rhema

There is nothing in the new testament to indicate at all the Jesus ever married. This surely would have been mentioned had it been true. One little scap of papyrus supposedly indicating to the contrary, in unknown context, written 400 years after His death pretty much is meaningless.

Besides, there could be missing words that put it into context such as “take” and “please.”


14 posted on 09/22/2012 1:32:22 PM PDT by HerrBlucher (Praise to the Lord the Almighty the King of Creation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HerrBlucher
Besides, there could be missing words that put it into context such as “take” and “please.”

Along with the indispensable <rimshot>.

<rimshot>

21 posted on 09/22/2012 1:47:59 PM PDT by thulldud (Is it "alter or abolish" time yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: HerrBlucher
Besides, there could be missing words that put it into context such as “take” and “please.”

Along with a partially decipherable attribution to one H-n-y -oun-ma-

34 posted on 09/22/2012 5:38:39 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson