Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Ghosts of Jimmy Carter ^ | September 23, 2012 | Jeff Carter

Posted on 09/23/2012 2:46:52 PM PDT by Kaslin

One of the more piquant details in the tale of Mitt Romney's damning "47 percent" video is that it was unearthed online by James Earl Carter IV, a grandson and namesake of the 39th president. The self-described "oppo researcher [and] political junkie" told NBC News that he tracked down the person who recorded Romney's remarks at a May fundraiser, then put him in touch with Mother Jones, the left-wing magazine that publicized the video last Monday. Carter's "research assistance" was credited in a terse endnote, but the reaction from his grandfather was more effusive: "James," the former president emailed, "This is extraordinary. Congratulations! Papa."

The younger Carter wasn't coy about why he facilitated the leak. "I'm a partisan Democrat," he said. "My motivation is to help Democrats get elected."

But it was also personal. According to NBC, he wanted to retaliate against Romney's "frequent attacks on the presidency of his grandfather" -- particularly the suggestion that Barack Obama's faltering foreign policy is Carteresque in its irresolution. "It gets under my skin -- mostly the weakness on the foreign policy stuff," the grandson said. "I just think it's ridiculous. I don't like criticism of my family."

Well, who does? You can't fault the guy for wanting to defend his grandfather's reputation, but Jimmy Carter's reputation as a foreign-policy schlemiel can hardly be blamed on the Romney campaign. Americans came to that conclusion more than 30 years ago, having watched the world grow more dangerous -- and America's enemies more brazen -- during Carter's feckless years as steward of US national security.

"There was strong evidence that voters … wanted a tougher American foreign policy," reported The New York Times on November 5, 1980, the morning after Ronald Reagan crushed Carter's reelection bid in a 44-state landslide. By a nearly 2-to-1 ratio, voters surveyed in exit polls "said they wanted this country to be more forceful in dealing with the Soviet Union, 'even if it increased the risk of war.'"

In fact, Reagan's muscular, unapologetic approach to international relations -- "peace through strength" -- didn't increase the risk of war with the Soviets. It reduced it. Within a decade of his election, the Soviet empire -- as Reagan foretold -- would be relegated to the ash-heap of history.

Like all presidents, Reagan got many things wrong. But one thing he got very right was that American weakness is provocative. A foreign-policy blueprint that emphasizes the need for American constraint, deference, and apology -- what Obama's advisers today call "leading from behind" -- is a recipe for more global disorder, not less. Carter came to office scolding Americans for their "inordinate fear of communism;" he launched diplomatic relations with Fidel Castro's dictatorship and welcomed the takeover of Nicaragua by a Marxist junta. Only when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan in 1979 did Carter wake up to the dangers of appeasing communist totalitarianism. Moscow's naked aggression, he confessed, had made a "dramatic change in my opinion of what the Soviets' ultimate goals are."

Equally disastrous was Carter's reaction to the seizure of the US Embassy in Tehran following the Ayatollah Khomeini's Islamic revolution. Bernard Lewis, the dean of Middle East historians, writes that Carter's meek response -- from his letter appealing to Khomeini "as a believer to a man of God" to his abandonment of the overthrown Shah, a longtime US ally -- helped convince dictators and fanatics across the Middle East "that it was safer and more profitable to be an enemy rather than a friend of the United States."

Is it fair to compare Obama's foreign policy to Carter's? The similarities were especially vivid after the murder of four US diplomats at the American consulate in Benghazi. Even more so when the administration insisted that the outbreak of anti-American violence by rampaging Islamists in nearly 30 countries was due solely to a YouTube video mocking Islam -- a video the White House bent over backward to condemn.

But Obama-Carter likenesses were being remarked on long before this latest evidence of what the appearance of US weakness leads to. Obama was still a presidential hopeful when liberal historian Sean Wilentz observed in 2008 that he "resembles Jimmy Carter more than he does any other Democratic president in living memory." Within weeks of Obama's inauguration, troubling parallels could already be detected. In January 2010, Foreign Policy magazine's cover story, "The Carter Syndrome," wondered whether the 44th president's foreign policy was beginning to collapse "into the incoherence and reversals" that had characterized No. 39's.

The Carter years are a warning of what can happen when the "Leader of the Free World" won't lead. It may irk his grandson to hear it, but Jimmy Carter's legacy is still too timely to ignore.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 47percent; foreignaffairs; jimmycarter; middleeast

1 posted on 09/23/2012 2:46:59 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
To conservatives, Obama is Jimmy Carter, squared.

Even apathetic U.S. voters who aren't terribly interested in 'foreign policy' bristle at film of rampaging Muslim mobs dragging the corpse of a U.S. ambassador through the street or the ripping down and burning of the American flag from U..S. embassies in the middle east.

I believe a majority of Americans are fed up with Muslim crazies destroying U.S. property and murdering our people abroad under the guise of some phony 'outrage' about their precious prophet. Obama's weak and subservient posture in the middle east, his near-abandonment of Israel and his blatant soft spot for anything Muslim is becoming all too apparent and repulsive to many Americans, not only those of us on the distinct political right.

Come election day, all the media BS about the 'neck-and-neck' presidential race will be blown away by a solid victory for challenger Mitt Romney.

2 posted on 09/23/2012 3:05:23 PM PDT by Jim Scott (Obama must be defeated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott

I believe a majority of Americans are fed up with Muslim crazies destroying U.S. property and murdering our people abroad under the guise of some phony ‘outrage’ about their precious prophet.

I so hope you are correct, but I fear that most are not paying attention but can tell you all about the latest celebrity pairings and the doings on “American Idol”.

3 posted on 09/23/2012 4:00:06 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Pray for our republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Imagine getting stuck with a spectacular failure’s name and then passing it on. How much can one not like one’s own descendants?

4 posted on 09/23/2012 5:27:20 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This grandson should be really glad that obama is doing so badly. It makes Carter the 2nd worst president we have ever had, instead of the number 1 worst.
5 posted on 09/23/2012 5:36:35 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson