Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/24/2012 6:09:05 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sub-Driver

Sure sounds like the march from 47% to 49% is planned to end at above the 50% mark. The question is are they too lazy to vote in greater numbers than us..


2 posted on 09/24/2012 6:14:49 AM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

“by Charles C. Johnson?”

Not the Little Green Footballs Charles Johnson is it?


3 posted on 09/24/2012 6:16:17 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Obama also said he viewed welfare recipients and “the working poor” as “a majority coalition” that could be mobilized to help advance progressive policies and elect their champions.

Remove the concept of violent revolution (maybe, maybe not), and this is a paraphrase of the Communist Manifesto.


5 posted on 09/24/2012 6:36:49 AM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

The problem ~ and it’s really one for the Mittbots ~ is discovering Obama and Romney agree on all the fundamentals ~ as I warned you!


6 posted on 09/24/2012 6:40:20 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Unless I can verify this article I'm not going to read it. Also, I believe that keeping your head in the sand, at least if you are the MSM, serves our national purpose.


7 posted on 09/24/2012 6:41:15 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Would like to see a full transcript of this speech, I haven’t found one yet.


8 posted on 09/24/2012 6:50:19 AM PDT by justlittleoleme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Obama has always planned on a coalition based on the “takers”. He has achieved it with those not paying income taxes being a major portion of the group. Others are educators, union members, homosexuals, communists & socialists, minorities and the elderly who depend on social security and medicare for survival. Does this group constitute 47% ? Guess we will find out in November.
13 posted on 09/24/2012 7:52:59 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
And there are still some eeeevil meanie people like Rush, Hannity and Levin who believe that Obama is intentionally destroying the country to try to make everybody dependent upon the government. Where could they get such wild ideas?...(/sarc)
14 posted on 09/24/2012 8:02:14 AM PDT by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
I transcribed some of it:

What I think will re-engage people in politics is if we’re doing significant, serious policy work around uh what I will label the working poor although my definition of the working poor is not simply folks making minimum wage, but it’s also families of four who are making $30,000 a year uh uh they are struggling And to the extent that we are doing research figuring out um what kinds of government action uh would successfully make their lives better, we are then putting together a potential majority coalition to a move those agendas forward.”

One of the good things about welfare reform which the 1996 legislation I did not entirely agree with and would have probably voted against it at the federal level, but one good thing that comes out of it is that it essentially desegregates the welfare population which presumably is black uhh and uhh undeserving and urban uh versus the working poor which are bitta?? people, um now you just have one batch of folks, folks who are working but don't have health insurance aren't making much money, can't figure out a daycare, uhh don't a spend an hour and a half trying to commute to jobs that do exist um don't have much opportunity for uh enhancing their skills so that they can actually move up into a income bracket that would support uh that is an increasingly a majority population and so to the extent that we have policy systems that are thinking about how do we provide effective health care to those populations uh how do we provide job training so that people can upgrade their skills when thier in these jobs how do we provide effective child care and um of course how do we educate the children in these families in such a way that uh uh they are able to access economic opportunity I think those are going to be the critical policy questions uh that we uh face in the coming century and I don't think by the way that that is just uh a problem for urban areas or the inner city or for particular populations I think that that cuts across issues of race uh and geography and as a consequence becomes a useful means for coupling policy with politics...

**SNIP**(story)

...I am actually a strong believer that if we organize policy around um issues of economics that diverse populations have in common we will have uh uh the the basis and the conversation will have taken place and the coalitions will have been formed around which can address some of the issues George has so effectively organized uh uh..

UH uh uh uh

15 posted on 09/24/2012 8:06:50 AM PDT by justlittleoleme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
thanks for the post. 8-)

17 posted on 09/24/2012 8:17:17 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (WA DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me Old $hit; w/ different flie$" :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson