To: Red Badger
Reweighting polls with skewed samples (that provide enough internals to allow this) can lead to a more accurate result. However, I’m not certain that unskewedpolls.com’s use of Rasmussen’s August 2012 party affiliation data as weights isn’t too extreme a correction, leading to too rosy a picture of GOP prospects this fall.
6 posted on
09/25/2012 8:02:07 AM PDT by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
To: The_Reader_David
Wouldn’t that be the latest and best data?
18 posted on
09/25/2012 9:13:04 AM PDT by
Doctor 2Brains
(If the government were Paris Hilton, it could not score a free drink in a bar full of lonely sailors)
To: The_Reader_David
Reweighting polls with skewed samples (that provide enough internals to allow this) can lead to a more accurate result. However, Im not certain that unskewedpolls.coms use of Rasmussens August 2012 party affiliation data as weights isnt too extreme a correction, leading to too rosy a picture of GOP prospects this fall.
I agree. It's a little suspicious when Rasmussen part-ID weighting when applied to these other polls gives Rasmussen a significantly larger advantage than Rasmussen's own poll, which recently has had had Romney down a point or two.
It would seem that these "unskewed" polls are doing a bit of over-correction.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson