There needs to be a strict no fraternization policy -- the active homosexuals need to take a vow of chastity/celibacy while they're on the base or on duty, as otherwise it is completely disruptive. This is precisely why the new policy allowing open homosexuality in the military was unwise -- it could be clearly foreseen that it would be disruptive, and particularly in a combat situation, for there to be this kind of sexual tension among soldiers.
The UCMJ already addresses sodomy, unless it was changed, which is why this is another example of over-reaching of authority by the President.
It doesn’t matter how many rules, regulations, vows, promises, pay dockings or cuts in ratings are put into place, it won’t stop anything.
There is a reason military forces have traditionally been all male, and homosexuality has been prohibited by expulsion: Because the sexual drive is not controllable by rules, punishment and regulation.
Homosexual men engage in unprotected sex even though it is KNOWN that there is a highly communicable, often fatal disease that can be transmitted.
Men and women in muslim countries engage in adultery KNOWING that a violent, primitive and painful death awaits at least one of them (the woman) if they are caught.
Men will destroy their lives, throw away their careers, destroy their marriages and lose all their money because of sex.
A “no fraternization policy” means nothing.
Kick them out of the military! Would you trust a homo to guard your back?
Celibate homosexuals, isn’t that like jumbo shrimp?
The Sex Positive Agenda is anti-abstinence, they consider it “unhealthy”.
Fragging will become the only way to resolve the issue and if men are being raped by other men???