And I said, “Prostitution by ANY OTHER NAME would still be immoral.” What about that did you not understand? What makes you think that a man (you, frinstance?) would “settle” for housekeeping skills if you knew a woman was dependent on you for her life?
You are no better than many of the overbearing, controlling, woman-hating men I’ve run across in my life, and your ideas are worse than cavemannish. At least cavemen recognized the real worth of women and respected them for their worth. You seem to look at women as chattel.
Not gonna happen, dude. You need a real life lesson on womanhood. With men like you, the human race would have ceased to exist a long time ago.
Abuse is abuse. You seem to think it’s OK. NOT!
^5
What makes you thing that a man wouldn't? They are called 'Housekeepers'. When I want one I hire one. There have been several times that I've hired Housekeepers when I really didn't need or want one because of folks (male or female) were down on their luck and needed help.
Room and board for cooking, cleaning, shopping, painting, yardwork, etc. This is how the world turns Monkey Face.
PapaBear's suggestion right was on target IMO. I saw nothing sexual or sexist about it.
Yes it would still be immoral, I don’t think it is even questionable