Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: smoothsailing

“Quinnipiac Pollster Admits: ‘Probably Unlikely’ That Electorate Will Feature Massive Dem Skew”

That’s right, jackwagon. Start walking that cart back to reality-ville.


2 posted on 09/26/2012 12:23:26 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VanDeKoik
“That’s right, jackwagon. Start walking that cart back to reality-ville.”

Quinnipiac University BS'ing in their polls for years.

5 posted on 09/26/2012 12:31:24 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: VanDeKoik
HEWITT seemed to be asking that the numbers derived with a straight forward random sample poll BE CHANGED!!!!!

When you do that it's not a random sample poll anymore.

Do you seriously believe the polls should be weighted and adjusted ~ .......... ~ isn't the background complaint that the Democrats are weighting and adjusting the polls so they no longer reflect the reality?

Do you think you can have it both ways ~ pure random selection polls that are not weighted and adjusted unless they are weighted and adjusted!?

Recognize that in 2008 the Democrats turned out 15% more Democrat voters than the Republicans turned out Republican voters. 15% is a huge difference and Hewitt is quibbling over 9% ~ is he the source of this utterly confusing and baseless debate over oversampling (as some call it)

8 posted on 09/26/2012 12:40:48 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson