Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A Navy Vet

I’ll go you one further: I don’t think the romantic element belongs on the combat team. How about no homosexuals period and no mixed sexed units below the division level or aboard combat vessels. Your a navy man, is there any reason a vessel could not have a female only crew?


19 posted on 09/27/2012 12:02:33 PM PDT by MSF BU (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: MSF BU
"Your a navy man, is there any reason a vessel could not have a female only crew?"

Yes, because there are many ratings (specialties) that require upper body strength. Most women don't have it. It would require many manly dykes to deal with the simple maintenance of a Navy ship, not to mention other areas. Then, there is the problem with menstrual cycles of a woman only ship, not to mention even more pregnancies when in port. There are already too many of them occurring on mixed sex ships. Often times, their male counterparts have to pick up the slack. Think about it.

21 posted on 09/27/2012 12:19:54 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: MSF BU
Your a navy man, is there any reason a vessel could not have a female only crew?


32 posted on 09/27/2012 2:31:12 PM PDT by itsahoot (I'll write in Palin in 2012. That is 1 vote for Palin, 0 votes for Romney and Zer0 votes for Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson