Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News poll: 79 percent say all Americans should pay income taxes
FoxNews ^ | 9/27/12 | Dana Blanton

Posted on 09/27/2012 4:45:47 PM PDT by Jean S

A large majority of likely voters believes all Americans should pay some federal income tax -- even if it is as little as one percent of what they make.    

Seventy-nine percent say everyone should pay something, according to a Fox News poll released Thursday.  That includes 85 percent of Republicans, 83 percent of independents and 71 percent of Democrats.

According to the IRS, last year approximately 41 percent of tax filers did not pay federal income tax.  The Tax Policy Center estimates that will increase to 46 percent this year.  

Most voters (73 percent) are at least somewhat familiar with the widely-broadcast videotape of Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney talking about “47 percent of Americans” and the number of people paying no federal income tax.  Romney also talks about his concern that the country is becoming an entitlement society and that many are too dependent on government.  Journalists and pundits speculated the tape would damage Romney’s campaign.  Yet a 63-percent majority thinks the substance of Romney’s comment about dependence on government is mostly (36 percent) or somewhat true (27 percent).  

Three out of four voters believes the “average American” is at least somewhat dependent on government (76 percent), while less than a third says they personally are (31 percent).  

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 09/27/2012 4:45:49 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jean S

I agree. There should be a minimum tax that everyone should have to pay regardless of income.

That or remove the vote from those who do not pay taxes.

No taxation without representation should also include no representation without taxation!


2 posted on 09/27/2012 4:47:54 PM PDT by MeganC (Our forefathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S; Revolting cat!

21% also say they shouldn’t have to pay for their cellphones.


3 posted on 09/27/2012 4:48:47 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Obama likes to claim credit for getting Osama. Why hasn't he tried Khalid Sheikh Mohammed yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Amen. Everyone needs skin in the game. Even if it is $100 minimum.


4 posted on 09/27/2012 4:49:18 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

I would bw more than happy to pay more in taxes. Thar being said it should not go for research on the drinking habits of chinese whores. It should not go to foreign governments that take our money and use it to attack us


5 posted on 09/27/2012 4:52:00 PM PDT by South Dakota (shut up and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

I agree, if we must have a tax increase, I think it should be perhaps 1/2 % on first dollar, no exemptions.
That way everyone would have “skin in the game” as BigEars likes to say.


6 posted on 09/27/2012 4:52:22 PM PDT by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

63% agree with Romney. He should do what Rush said today. use in a stump speech that we are all “victims” of Obama’s economic policies.


7 posted on 09/27/2012 4:54:34 PM PDT by nhwingut (Sarah Palin 12... No One Else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

Agree 1,000%.Everyone over the age of 18 with total income above $500 (adjusted only for inflation) should pay *something*...even if it’s only $25.No representation without taxation!


8 posted on 09/27/2012 4:57:57 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
A recent cell phone poll to likely Obama cell phone users gave Obama the lead by 100%
9 posted on 09/27/2012 5:05:18 PM PDT by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

Amen!

LLS


10 posted on 09/27/2012 5:06:05 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("if it looks like you are not gonna make it you gotta get mean, I mean plumb mad-dog mean" J. Wales)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

This is just more evidence that conservatives need to quit poll watching and just keep the faith until Nov 6. The majority of people are sick of the status quo and want change. The news media is trying so so hard to discourage us and make us think that Obama has a commanding lead. It will get worse. Just know that they are desperate and will say and do anything trying to salvage the broken dreams of Obama. It’s not going to happen, because he cannot change. He is all about himself and his self image is all he cares about. Anyone that thinks he has any interest in their well being is a fool. I think there are far fewer fools today than there were in 2008 and I think Nov 6th will prove it.


11 posted on 09/27/2012 5:07:53 PM PDT by lwoodham (I am Andrew Breitbart. Don't doubt me on this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

Agree something has to be done. Some reform is needed.

THIS administration has shown us all the extent the Fed is funded by over taxation be it on the citizens, business, and/or resources simply in the manner in which they have brazenly flaunted their abuse of those monies confiscated.

If the government must find ways to spend our hard earned money then they damned well don’t need it.

Only the money necessary to fund the Constitutional functions of the Federal Government, and a small reserve is necessary for the Federal Government to collect, and that should be from the States, not the citizens, nor the businesses of the citizens, nor should the Fed have the right to tax, assess, or otherwise the resources of the States.

This whole thing has gotten out of perspective thanks to weasel representation be it Left, or Right.


12 posted on 09/27/2012 5:09:03 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Then there are those who PAY NO TAX and RECEIVE A REFUND.


13 posted on 09/27/2012 5:09:17 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Obama likes to claim credit for getting Osama. Why hasn't he tried Khalid Sheikh Mohammed yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

I wonder how many of those people who think that everyone should pay some income tax have a negative tax liability, but think that it’s just a refund that they deserve, without understanding what a negative tax liability is.


14 posted on 09/27/2012 5:14:26 PM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC
No taxation without representation should also include no representation without taxation!

Here I thought I was alone. Love your tagline.
15 posted on 09/27/2012 5:15:17 PM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Yep. I’m expressing a similar sentiment right after your post.


16 posted on 09/27/2012 5:17:24 PM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

Actually, I’m of the opposite opinion. I think that no Americans should pay income tax, since it’s a really bad system and arguably unconstitutional. Still, if we are going to be forced to pay it, then it should be equally levied on everyone who makes an income.


17 posted on 09/27/2012 5:35:45 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

all should pay—even if its like 1 or 2% of that they make—can’t pay? then they should work for the government to work off their debt! Clean trails in parks, sweep the roads, pick up trash, Pain out graffiti. etc...


18 posted on 09/27/2012 8:57:23 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Actually, I’m of the opposite opinion. I think that no Americans should pay income tax, since it’s a really bad system and arguably unconstitutional. Still, if we are going to be forced to pay it, then it should be equally levied on everyone who makes an income.

Bingo! If we must be taxed, it should be situation-specific vs. across the board. The situations should be voted on by those in the arena being affected by the "good that the government wants to do for the little peeples". Wouldn't take long for the government to lean out and we would only be getting taxed for actual societal necessities and have a much better sense of where our money was being used - no more egotistical monuments to those who "govern".

19 posted on 09/28/2012 3:28:27 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
9% of every dollar of earned income, no deductions, no exemptions. Economically best would be no other income tax, not on business, not on received interest or capital gains. Easier but more economically deleterious would be extending the 9% to all forms of income. Requiring the recipient to "write the check" would help to keep the taxpayer aware that he is, in fact, paying taxes. Couple that with a ban on the government borrowing money, an end to transfer payments of all kinds, and an end to most regulation of business. The permanent ascension of the nation to the tơp of the economic world is a given. Poverty would still exist because of the propensity to measure it as the bottom xx% but real poverty would be utterly voluntary or due to insanity and would be more than taken care of by charity and private organizations.

Alas this cannot exist in a large population with many members who care more for power over other people as the path to wealth or for its own sake. Installing that tax system and cutting out the regulation would extend the run of America the Richest and Strongest for another generation or so, though. If we did that over the next four years, the Collapse that is already baked in the cake would be a short sharp event that would be a subject of anecdotes for a few years. It wouldn't last long enough for people to actually starve. The collapse we seem determined to have will probably include some measure of old time famine.

20 posted on 09/28/2012 3:59:33 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE www.fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson