Anti-Islam Filmmaker Nakoula B. Nakoula Arrested, U.S. Attorney Says

Wall Street Journal ^

[Iron Munro]

And to think the entire nation was aghast at Nixon’s cover-up of the two bit Plumbers break in.

How far we have fallen.

[aposiopetic]

OBAMA MISDIRECTION TO COVER FOR THE WHITE HOUSE’S AND SUSAN RICE’S LIES ABOUT THE LIBYAN 9/11 TERRORIST ATTACK THEY WERE PRE-WARNED ABOUT

Or that they orchestrated.

You never know.

[wtd]

+10

[Revel]

“A clip posted to Google Inc.’s YouTube by someone calling himself Sam Bacile in July, which purported to be a trailer for a film about the Prophet Muhammad, has sparked deadly protests in the Middle East. “

You can always count on the WSJ to repeat a leftist media liberal Lie.

[Natufian]

But he was on probation for an unrelated (i.e., non-First Amendment) charge. I can understand someone being prohibited from possessing firearms (i.e., Second Amendment) while on probation for a violent crime (say, assault and battery), as the two are tangentially related. But there just is no correlation between, in this case, the First Amendment and bank fraud.

He used computers and the internet to perpetrate the bank fraud. It's not uncommon to see such restrictions on criminals.

[trebb]

With Obama in the WH...nothing ever smells right.;-) I get the strange sensation that Obama is behind this film (smells like Fast and Furious).

He always gives hints that he's into something dirty. In this case he called the demonstrations a "natural reaction". He has to go or we will have blood in the streets as he goes about what he considers to be his "business" with the Nation. I don't believe anyone in his Administration would hesitate to "reason" with the People by killing a boatload of us.

[ought-six]

I guess I was applying the First Amendment in its most basic element: Freedom to express political and social ideas and thoughts. I found it hard to believe that expressing one’s political ideas would be prohibited by having a conviction for bank fraud. Now, however, I see that prohibiting his use of a computer while on probation does make some sense, as apparently he did use the internet to commit the fraud. So, it that respect, his First Amendment rights are still inviolate, but his means of expression have been curtailed somewhat.