Posted on 09/29/2012 1:23:37 PM PDT by Kaslin
New York Times White House correspondent Jackie Calmes off lead in Wednesday's edition on Obama's struggle with the federal deficit, "Test for Obama As Deficit Stays Over $1 Trillion." Credit Calmes for the premise and the Times for the prominent placement, but as usual, Calmes waved the blame away from Obama and again clung to the dubious idea that ObamaCare would actually reduce the deficit.
"Four years ago, Barack Obama campaigned for president on a promise to cut annual federal budget deficits in half by the end of his term. Then came financial calamity, $1.4 trillion in stimulus measures and a maddeningly slow economic recovery," she wrote:
Now, despite small annual improvements, the deficit for the fiscal year that ends on Sunday will surpass $1 trillion for the fourth straight time. Against that headline-grabbing figure, Mr. Obamas explanation -- that the deficit he inherited is actually on a path to be cut in half just a year later than he promised, measured as a percentage of the economys total output -- risks sounding professorial at best.The fiscal imbalance on Mr. Obamas watch, however much a result of economic and demographic factors beyond his control as well as his own policy choices, has increased the nations accumulated debt by about 40 percent and has saddled him with one of his biggest vulnerabilities. Facing off against Mitt Romney, Mr. Obama is on the defensive over deficits and debt nearly as much as he is over unemployment.
Dealing with deficits is the one major issue in which voters in polls regularly register more confidence in Mr. Romney than in Mr. Obama. It is also a flash point in the partisan war over the size and scope of government.
....
Mr. Romney has characterized his call for the repeal of Mr. Obamas health care law as a budget saving measure, but the Congressional Budget Office has said that repeal would add more than $100 billion to the deficit over the next decade. Mr. Romneys main proposal for reducing deficits in the short run is to cap all spending by the end of his term at a level equal to 20 percent of gross domestic product, the average for the 30 years before the recession, before spending on stimulus measures, unemployment aid and retiree benefits helped drive spending to the current 23 percent.
Calmes originally wrote that the Congressional Budget Office claimed a repeal of ObamaCare would add more than $800 billion to the deficit (the story has been corrected online: the actual CBO figure was more than $100 billion).
But both figures are dubious, because there is skepticism that Congress will stick to reducing payments to Medicare, among other things. The House Budget Committee (chaired by Paul Ryan) accuses the White House of using "gimmicks and double-counting," which the CBO is required to take at face value. And conservative economists have predicted ObamaCare will add to the deficit.
“Test for Obama as Deficit Stays Over $1 Trillion”
“Test” implies it isn’t his fault. The “test” came in the first year of his administration and the “Over $1 Trillion” part is a direct indication of his “F-” grade.
what a deluded nut case
As a journalist (and I use the term loosely) she knows nothing about health care, and her comments in this area should be treated as such. For those who think people like her should be telling the rest of us what kind of health care we should have, I suggest you call her next time you need a doctor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.