Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secession! Lakota Sioux Nation Leaves The Union! (Again)
CNSNews.com ^ | September 29, 2012 | Dan Gainor

Posted on 09/29/2012 5:01:47 PM PDT by Makana

President Barack Obama has an unexpected foreign policy problem – in the Western United States. The Lakota Sioux nation has seceded from the United States, according to a story on the anti-American website La Voz de Aztlan.

“We are no longer citizens of the United States of America and all those who live in the five-state area that encompasses our country are free to join us,” long-time Native American radical leader Russell Means said. The move potentially impacts the states of Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming.

He(Means) has continued his push for Sioux independence in the decades since. The Lakota declared independence in 2007, as well, with Means proclaiming: “United States colonial rule is at its end!”

This time, Means detailed reasons for the secession including a long list of problems facing the Lakota, such as unemployment, healthcare and life expectancy as well use of natural resources. In a rambling video, he also added a massive number of reasons for why his new nation would be both strong and lawful – talking about everything from credit card companies to global warming as problems they aim to escape

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: federalgovernment; indian; lakota; russellmeans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
"Chingachgook" is at it again. He's likely upset because ObamaCare singles out "Urban Native Americans" for the goodies.

Let's see if the MSM picks this up.

1 posted on 09/29/2012 5:01:50 PM PDT by Makana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Makana

Ya. Whatever, Russ.

Good luck with that.


2 posted on 09/29/2012 5:03:58 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny ("Allah" isn't a god. It's a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana

So, did the Sioux Lakota Nation actually declare that they’ve seceded, or this just Russell Means shooting his mouth off?


3 posted on 09/29/2012 5:06:18 PM PDT by verum ago (Hey UN: Molon Labe applies to our dollars, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana

Can they take Elizabeth Warren with them?


4 posted on 09/29/2012 5:06:28 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93destr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana

Good deal! If they are now an enemy nation inside our borders, I say send in the Marines and level them. Take that Lakota! Take that moldy old treaty and shove it up your collective rectum!


5 posted on 09/29/2012 5:10:08 PM PDT by MtBaldy (If Obama is the answer, it must have been a really stupid question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer

From your mouth to God’s ears!


6 posted on 09/29/2012 5:10:14 PM PDT by copwife (All God's creatures have a place in the choir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer
Can they take Elizabeth Warren with them?

Maybe Lie-a-watha will actually be able to practice law in that new nation.

7 posted on 09/29/2012 5:10:36 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Makana

Next thing you know, they will acquire nukes


8 posted on 09/29/2012 5:12:55 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer
I doubt Warren will go unless it's as Ambassador. Wait! I believe Cherokees and Sioux are traditional enemies.

We'll have to be satisfied sending them a few billion. See “The Mouse that Roared.”

9 posted on 09/29/2012 5:13:18 PM PDT by Makana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

Can’t we just steal it back again?


10 posted on 09/29/2012 5:16:00 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Makana

LOL! The Duchy of Grand Fenwick. Again.


11 posted on 09/29/2012 5:16:03 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93destr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Makana

Russell Means Comments on Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize. Calls obama The Flim Flam Man. Not for the same reasons as we would have, but still...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kKiRheypcs&feature=related

I just found this and I was stuned!!


12 posted on 09/29/2012 5:16:11 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana
The Second Civil War has begun!

OK, not really. How does this genius expect to defend his newly independent country?

13 posted on 09/29/2012 5:17:42 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana

I just hope the gummint’s got the welfare checks cut off already.


14 posted on 09/29/2012 5:18:15 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana
I believe Cherokees and Sioux are traditional enemies.

Doubt it. The Cherokees in OK tangled with Comanche, Kiowa and Cheyenne.

But I think the Lakota were too far north for them to have much contact.

Possibly you are thinking of the Crow?

15 posted on 09/29/2012 5:21:16 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins all the battles. Reality wins all the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Makana

If this means none of them vote this November, I think I’m all for this.


16 posted on 09/29/2012 5:24:44 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Makana

The Cherokee and Sioux have had little to do with one another.

The Lakota Sioux kicked the Crow out of the tall grass prairie country during their migration out of Minnesota in the early 19th Century. Most Crows these days (I’ve known a few) loathe the Sioux.


17 posted on 09/29/2012 5:27:12 PM PDT by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Makana
Means detailed reasons for the secession including a long list of problems facing the Lakota, such as unemployment, healthcare and life expectancy as well use of natural resources

Additional comments from Means included; This time we cannot blame white eyes.

18 posted on 09/29/2012 5:28:00 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Note my post. I wrote a paper about massacres of the Crow by the Sioux back in my early historian days, as it were.


19 posted on 09/29/2012 5:29:11 PM PDT by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: warchild9

And of course the Crow drove the Shoshone out of what they now consider their homeland.


20 posted on 09/29/2012 5:34:45 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins all the battles. Reality wins all the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson