I understand they have to be lumped to be noticeable. But why do we consider the lump plausible? I mean, we know Democrats live off a patchwork of mutually antagonistic groups. But usually they are listed one by one: women, oldies, blacks, the youth, etc. No one refers to the black/college vote, or the women/farmer lobby. So why LGTB? Flotsam fellas who become gals still have sex with gals, making them lesbianesque or less confusingly heterosexual. What do they have to do with gays or bis? Nothing, except abnormality.
——why do we consider the lump plausible?-——
Well, this discussion is an indication that some of us don’t.
My guess is that the real reason for lumping all the degenerate sexual deviants is money. Money lumped speaks louder than money fragmented