Posted on 09/30/2012 4:27:41 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
Egypt’s new leader Mohamed Morsi is proving to be a cunning communicator, at least so far as what he puts across to undiscerning Western ears. He manages to sound exceedingly moderate and reasonable, while enunciating unreasonable, indeed radical demands that must be met or else. He in effect says that “it’s my way or the highway.”
Thus, while seeming to affirm his commitment to the 33-year-old peace with Israel, Morsi at the same time piles up impediments upon which he now makes that peace contingent.
The inescapable inference is that if his conditions are not accepted, he would consider himself absolved of his obligation to keep the peace.
Add to that the fact that his stipulations are all but impossible to accede to and a whole other picture emerges than that which is commonly perceived overseas.
Two examples are particularly disturbing. The first is the strident suggestion from Cairo that it is essential that the 1979 Camp David peace treaty with Israel be amended. What Morsi wants is abrogation of the clauses that demilitarize Sinai and prohibit Egyptian army presence there.
Morsi would rather his foreign audiences forget that Israel gave up Sinai and that its one tangible gain from its great concession was the safety of demilitarization that created a sizable buffer zone. Thus Israel was assured that it could not be surprised by a sudden attack from Egypt. No military entry into Sinai could go undetected.
(Excerpt) Read more at jpost.com ...
Thx Pop...spread that word far and wide!
See 22, please.
Now the Food Stamp President and his lackeys will find out what it is really like to deal with the devil that you don’t know but bought into!!!!!!!!
Morsi had children born in the USA while he was ‘professing’ around the USA. According to many persons, even on FR, these children are eligible for POTUSA because of just being born on USA soil. The Founders warned against such possible allegiances by stipulating the requirement of ‘natural born’. To some persons this does not embrace citizenship of parents even though the Founders were very concerned with this possibility when They prescribed the terminology.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.