Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 353FMG

That’s right. But the 1st Amd is not up for negotiation, even after arresting the Innocence of Muslims guy for a “parole violation.”

We’ll keep pushing the islamokazis buttons, if our leaders like it or not. Screw them. WE own the 1st Amd, not THEM.


16 posted on 10/01/2012 3:59:09 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Travis McGee

My argument is as follows: How can we possibly allow a movement (Islam) to enjoy the protection of our 1st Amendment when that same interest group is clearly out to kill us?

Are we, as non-muslims, compelled to commit suicide or accept our murder because of our 1st Amendment? Pray tell, where is the f—king logic in it all?

Would one of you wise (and I am not being facetious) FReepers reply to this burning question that drives me to drink?

And please don’t repond with: “That’s why we have a 2nd Amendment.” because that is unacceptable.


19 posted on 10/01/2012 5:15:34 PM PDT by 353FMG (The US Constitution is only as effective as those who enforce it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson