Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

The RNC has nothing to do with state laws controlling ballot access.

Bachmann, Santorum, Perry, Newt, are all conservatives.

Why would you falsely claim I complain about “too much” conservatism when clearly my complaint is that there is too much stupidity goin’ on? Such stupidity prevents consolidation around a viable conservative if there was one available.

My complaint is meaningless since “conservatives” have repeatedly attacked their own in every election. They are easy to beat and rarely can win a statewide office (winners are inevitably attacked by “real” conservatives as “sellouts” and “RINOs”.

Almost anyone capable of winning a statewide election is the enemy of the “real” conservatives.


44 posted on 10/02/2012 9:54:22 AM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: arrogantsob

Your name selections are quite wrong. I said 3 were LIFELONG Conservative Republicans ~ apparently you are not aware of the histories behind the candidates.


45 posted on 10/02/2012 10:26:04 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: arrogantsob
Then what do you imagine the RNC does? Sure, the states pass their own laws, at the request of the parties, and they get guidance on these matters (Plus allocations of delegates depending on degree of conformance) from the RNC.

Priebus and the state committee chairmen seem to have little interest in protecting the franchise.

It is time to create a new RNC and invite the state parties to designate new chairmen to attend.

46 posted on 10/02/2012 10:29:29 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson