Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court possibilities if Obama is reelected
CNN ^ | October 1, 2012 | Bill Mears, Supreme Court Producer

Posted on 10/01/2012 4:33:51 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Here is an unofficial list of potential nominees for the Supreme Court if President Barack Obama is reelected. This list was compiled from a number of legal and political sources, including government officials deeply involved in the selections of Justices Sonia Sotomayor (2009) and Elena Kagan (2010).

The Obama administration, like those before, keeps an informal list of possible high court nominees to consider in the event of a sudden vacancy. But serious vetting only begins when such a vacancy occurs or is announced in advance by the retiring justice.

Kamala Harris, California attorney general

Born 1964. She was elected to her current job in 2010. She is part African-American, part Asian-American. Her father is a Jamaican-born Stanford University economics professor and her mother is an Indian-born (native Tamil) physician who works as a breast cancer specialist. Harris is a former San Francisco district attorney and author of "Smart on Crime." Her political savvy, ethnic background, telegenic personality, law enforcement credentials, and early support of President Obama's 2008 candidacy make her a favorite for any high court vacancy in any second-term, and possibly for U.S. Attorney General. Complications: Harris may seek re-election in 2014 and then may run for governor the following year.

Judge Paul Watford, 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, San Francisco

Born 1967. His age and race (African-American) have made him a favorite among some liberal court watchers. Named to the appeals court in 2012. Clerked for conservative Judge Alex Kozinski on the 9th Circuit, and later for liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. A former federal prosecutor and law firm partner. Supporters call him an ideological moderate, which may not sit well with progressives seeking a stronger left-leaning voice....

(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: obama; obamacare; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: rollo tomasi; All

Does this mean you favor the Supreme Court vote making Corporations people, and money speech? Are you not worried that now labor unions, and foreign Chinese and Russian millionaires can give secret money to Obama’s campaign? We really need an amendment returning us to what our founders intended.


21 posted on 10/02/2012 12:06:16 AM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
"Does this mean you favor the Supreme Court vote making Corporations people, and money speech? Are you not worried that now labor unions, and foreign Chinese and Russian millionaires can give secret money to Obama’s campaign?"

You pick a rabbit out of a hat and attempt to impress, lol? Had Repubs acted like dems when pushing ideological purity, Citizens United would not have been as close as the final ruling was. Thanks for making my point.

Shall I counter with Lawrence, Kelo, Hodgson v. Minnesota, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Roper v. Simmons, Christian Legal Society v. Martinez etc...
22 posted on 10/02/2012 7:28:31 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Obama is so arrogant I would not be surprised if he nominated Eric Holder.


23 posted on 10/02/2012 7:35:17 AM PDT by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rollo tomasi
The GOP moderates crave moral relativist and big government cronies, liberty from "Above" Justices are an accident, if history is our guide; either way a crap shoot with Romney, might surprise us if elected, but don't have high hopes though, lol. The only reason why I am voting for Romney, because of chance wich is pathetic if that is our biggest weapon against dems.

You've hit on something important. When the Republican Party actually doing what it claims in its party planks is considered a "happy accident" there has to be some soul searching. As it is, I've come to the conclusion that the Republican party is simply the party of lies. When was the last time they tried to overturn Roe v. Wade? When was the last time they really did something to restore the 2nd Amendment, like put the NCA or CGA up for repeal? When was the last time they seriously cut down government, say by dissolving an agency (and not simply rolling it into another)? What about Government Accountability? Fast & Furious shows what a lie that is, considering that on its face it was an unauthorized act of war and, by definition, state sponsored terrorism.

In trying to please everybody, the Republican party has/will/is become the party of nobody.

24 posted on 10/02/2012 8:10:15 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson