Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/01/2012 8:27:14 PM PDT by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Qbert

They don’t even have to raise taxes, they just mandate you buy things hey want


2 posted on 10/01/2012 8:30:40 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert; All

I have never understood why people who are anti abortion and anti welfare are also anti contraception. It is illogical.


5 posted on 10/01/2012 8:36:46 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

The judge was nominated by G.H.W. Bush in 1992. She is African American so maybe in her eyes Obama can do no wrong. Obama said his “compromise” solved the conscience issue and she is obviously buying it.


8 posted on 10/01/2012 8:49:25 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

“This Court rejects the proposition that requiring indirect financial support of a practice, from which plaintiff himself abstains according to his religious principles, constitutes a substantial burden on plaintiff’s religious exercise,” Jackson wrote.”

So indirect financial support is anything the state makes you pay for, as opposed to something you choose or not choose to pay for. Wow, land of the free indeed.

Freegards


11 posted on 10/01/2012 9:12:32 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Qbert

The court disagrees that the murder of a baby is a significant burden to your religion.

Really good coming from a Satanist.


15 posted on 10/01/2012 10:09:34 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson