Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The_Reader_David
Help me out here to respond to this from a lib:
So I'm just unclear on something. Romney says he will not raise taxes for middle class. But he will eliminates many deductions. How is this different? If I used to get a refund and will now have to pay isn't this essentially the same thing. Please explain.

I need to respond and shut this goof up. Takers?

70 posted on 10/04/2012 7:01:18 AM PDT by arbee4bush (My Dad, My Hero. Love You Dad!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: arbee4bush
>"If I used to get a refund and will now have to pay isn't this essentially the same thing. Please explain."

They'll have to vote for him to find out. /piglousy

91 posted on 10/04/2012 7:15:00 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: arbee4bush

The response is: He plans to cut rates across the board, and cap deductions — he talked about an aggregate cap on deductions, not eliminating deductions. Many in the middle class, esp. in the lower middle class, will not be affected by the cap on deductions, but will still see their rates, and thus their taxes drop. The cap on deductions will mostly prevent upper income earners from shielding their income from taxation.

As an aside, I’d prefer a more radical version of Romney’s idea: a cap on the amount of personal income excluded from taxation at the normal rates by any means (though obviously business expenses would remain fully deductible, since only the profit, not the revenue is actually income and I’d leave charitable contributions uncapped — we need to support the civil society, the ‘space between government and the individual’), I’d apply the cap to the total amount of deductions (other than charitable contributions and business expenses), plus tax exempt income, plus the amount of tax credits divided by the taxpayer’s marginal rate, plus the amount effectively shielded from taxation by favorable lower tax rates on classes of income (I don’t feel like working out the formula this morning).


102 posted on 10/04/2012 7:26:57 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: arbee4bush
Help me out here to respond to this from a lib: So I'm just unclear on something. Romney says he will not raise taxes for middle class. But he will eliminates many deductions. How is this different? If I used to get a refund and will now have to pay isn't this essentially the same thing. Please explain. The discussion regarding eliminating ddeductions is for those making more than $250,000 not the middle class.
137 posted on 10/04/2012 8:40:35 AM PDT by koraz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: arbee4bush

The elimation of deductions are offset by rate decreases. He said that several times, so I’m sure that your friend already knows the answer to their question.

Dump em!


144 posted on 10/04/2012 9:48:20 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson