Keep ‘em coming!
Are these polls coming out now showing Romney ahead still based on an oversampling of dems, presuming that 2008 turnout or even better-for-dems is expected this election?
If it’s true that late deciders tend to break for the challenger these are very good numbers.
Do they have the right participant sample? 48%D and 47% R?
Obama whacko supporters are in full panic mode in Ohio. I follow one of those idiots on Facebook(But will be dropping her in the next few weeks really can’t stand reading her gushing over Obama anymore) she is again out campaigning for Obama in Mason, Ohio..thats what she does everyday because she loves Govt run health care and free abortions(She is also on permanent disability so she is part of the 47 percent sitting at home waiting for their Govt paycheck to come)..I think Romney will win Ohio by about 4-5 points otherwise there wouldn’t be so much panic going on by the libs
Latest polls: Romney up nationally, and in FL, OH, VA, and CO. But, the headlines at the WSJ: “Obama Sees Fundraising Jump in September”, and at the NY Slimes: “Romney Claims of Bipartisan Success Face Challenge”. Corrupt!!!!
Think COAL.
Seriously? How could anyone still be undecided after the Wednesday night debate? If you were a cliff-hanger still at that point, and the scene you witnessed on the stage didn’t decide it for you, then you probably shouldn’t vote at all. The more likely story is people are messin’ with the pollsters.
I’ve been using an net zero turnout model. In 2008, Obama enjoyed +8D. In 2004, Bush +5R. In 2010, it was +1R. So, I’m o.k. with Wenzel’s partisan distribution (+1D).
Imposing a net zero turnout, Romney has been ahead in this state by about 2 points for the past six weeks or so.