Skip to comments.
Is a donor scandal about to rattle the Obama campaign?
Hotair ^
Posted on 10/06/2012 4:56:03 PM PDT by chessplayer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Media would ignore this just like Solyndra and F&F.
To: chessplayer
Why was there no donor scandal in 2008? Nothing has changed.
To: chessplayer
As Katie Pavlich posted on October 5, the Obama campaign is about to get rocked by a fundraising scandal involving taxes and foreign donors. Please.
Everybody knew that Soros laundered hundreds of million through untraceable prepaid debit cards to the Obama campaign in 2008.
Nobody in state-controlled media cared then, and nobody in state-controlled media will care now.
As a matter of fact, they applaud it.
3
posted on
10/06/2012 5:00:22 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Government is the religion of the psychopath.)
To: chessplayer
With Eric the Holder running the DOJ? I don’t think so.
4
posted on
10/06/2012 5:00:22 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Sorry Algore. It was attitude, NOT altitude.)
To: chessplayer
Another smoking gun rumor? Wow, this’ll bring Obamas desmise for sure\ sarc
5
posted on
10/06/2012 5:02:11 PM PDT
by
MNDude
(OWS Movement RIP)
To: chessplayer
Rattle? To be rattled that would mean that Osama Obama & Pals recognize that there's a “higher authority” than themselves.Rattled? Never.
6
posted on
10/06/2012 5:02:19 PM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive)
To: chessplayer
Well it turns out all those good liberals from the 60s & 70s who infest the media would be happily supportive of a corrupt one party state. I guess thats the ‘better way’ they were always talking about.
7
posted on
10/06/2012 5:04:30 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: MNDude
clinton took 500k from the daughter of a Chinese general.
no one cares unless its a (R)
8
posted on
10/06/2012 5:06:27 PM PDT
by
icwhatudo
(Low taxes and less spending in Sodom and Gomorrah is not my idea of a conservative victory)
To: chessplayer
Under promise; over deliver. Sort of like those Youtubes that say “This is the funniest baby/dog/animal/whatever video ever”. Riiiiight.
9
posted on
10/06/2012 5:12:39 PM PDT
by
Past Your Eyes
(You knew the job was dangerous when you took it.)
To: chessplayer
A question; does the FEC do anything about this stuff? Do they do anything?
To: chessplayer
The money is coming from that qe3 that is going to the banks, the banks are kicking some of that 40,000,000,000 a month back to barack in a very sneaky way. Not sneaky enough though. 40 billion in 120 million back. Win Win for the Banks and Barack.
11
posted on
10/06/2012 5:17:29 PM PDT
by
TomasUSMC
( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
To: chessplayer
It appears that anyone, anywhere can donate to President Obamas re-election campaign, all you need is a credit card number.
///
old news. he did the exact same in 2008. no one cared.
12
posted on
10/06/2012 5:20:05 PM PDT
by
Elendur
(It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. - Thomas Jefferson)
To: ilovesarah2012
The Obama campaign was questioned about their $750 million in donations in 2008. They investigated themselves and announced that all the donations were under the reportable limit so no problems. They have been investigating themselves ever since then and have never found any problems. You got a problem with that? Let me refer you to the Chicago thugs that protect Obama.
To: chessplayer
14
posted on
10/06/2012 5:23:44 PM PDT
by
1035rep
(Obama: "I killed Bin Laden" ...you didn't do that. Somebody else made that happen.)
To: 1035rep; a fool in paradise; Slings and Arrows
Hey, I resemble the photoshopping of my head out of the picture!
15
posted on
10/06/2012 5:25:49 PM PDT
by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong!)
To: 1035rep
To: ilovesarah2012
Right,that’s also why they didn’t agree to Federal financing. Exact criminal scam they ran last time. There was so many Saudi, donors, Soros etc,
17
posted on
10/06/2012 5:29:20 PM PDT
by
STD
(“Cogito, ergo armatum sum)
To: Revolting cat!
My mama told me you’d better shoop around.
18
posted on
10/06/2012 5:29:51 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Obama likes to claim credit for getting Osama. Why hasn't he tried Khalid Sheikh Mohammed yet?)
To: Revolting cat!
19
posted on
10/06/2012 5:32:11 PM PDT
by
1035rep
(Obama: "I killed Bin Laden" ...you didn't do that. Somebody else made that happen.)
To: chessplayer
I agree with all previous posters. This is a non event since he cakewalked on this in 2008. That is why the law should read such that contributions must be made to local political entities by personal check drawn from accounts from local bank accounts. This is so easy to regulate but the laws are a ruse. They are only there to give the appearance of propriety. The rules were written by politicians for politicians and McCain-Feingold only made it worse. Thank goodness Citizens United rebalanced the scales. The ultimate donor restriction is -—> No viable person or entity being fully resident in the United States of America shall contribute more than $100 per calendar year to any candidate for political office in the United States or other political entity or viable entity involved even marginally in any political activity.
20
posted on
10/06/2012 5:36:24 PM PDT
by
cashless
(Unlike Obama and his supporters, I'd rather be a TEA BAGGER than a TEA BAGGEE.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson