Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

This has me extremely pizzed.

” WOAI television reported district spokesman Pasqual Gonzalez said the two schools have a high rate of truancy, and the district could gain $2 million in state funding by improving attendance.

According to the San Antonio newspaper, the program is expected to cost the district $526,065 to implement with annual cost of $136,005 per year to continue running the program.”

BUT.....

Students refusing the chips were reportedly threatened with suspension, fines, or being involuntary transferred.
***********************************************

How does that make sense, exactly?! How?! The program will improve attendance and bring money to the school but they’re going to suspend or transfer students who won’t participate?! FINE them? FINE a student? Or do they mean the parent.

Well, if they’re tracking students 24/7 because a student will place it in a wallet or whatever. Then this must mean the school accepts responsibility for truant students and they can no longer fine parents or threaten to jail parents over truant students. The school absolutely has more ability to keep up with the child. So they own that responsibility.

Also, can parents now sue the pants off the school if the kid is somehow lost, abducted, hurt while skipping because the school didn’t monitor the students properly. The school is by default accepting FULL responsibility for these children. FULL and more.

Schools want to put cameras on garbage cans to see what food students are throwing away. Yeah right, have recycle cans—food this can, paper whatever other then have the janitor or whatever person weigh that garbage. No, the schools want to go after individual students, that is why cameras.

Some schools are going for the thumb or hand scan to buy lunch. They are training these kids to accept full monitoring of their lives, like pets, wards of the state. SLAVES, PROPERTY. Stupid reality TV doesn’t help this any.

Grrrr!

Look at the amount of money being spent on this cra9tastic program.

So is the state completely power hungry or is there also some businesses getting fat and greasing the palms of these POS school ‘officials’?! Stealing and wasting tax payer dollars and children’s education dollars. One, the other or both?


21 posted on 10/07/2012 1:31:01 AM PDT by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Irenic
Truancy problem?

Send out two guys in a Paddy Wagon to round them up. Maybe have two Paddy Wagons.

Vehicle cost, Maintenance, Gas and four Salaries wouldn't cost more than a quarter million a year.

22 posted on 10/07/2012 1:40:38 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (How do you insult an Obama Voter? Call them an Obama Voter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Irenic
How does that make sense, exactly?! How?! The program will improve attendance and bring money to the school but they’re going to suspend or transfer students who won’t participate?! FINE them? FINE a student? Or do they mean the parent.

It makes complete sense, once you realize that the only thing those kids represent to the school is a pile of money. If they aren't there when state attendence is taken, the state doesn't pay the school for them. Ca$h is allowcated based on daily attendence figures. To a school official this is serious business. They don't notice (or don't care) if Johnny can't read, but when Johnny impacts their gravy train, watch out!

91 posted on 10/07/2012 10:53:47 AM PDT by zeugma (Rid the world of those savages. - Dorothy Woods, widow of a Navy Seal, AMEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Irenic
So is the state completely power hungry or is there also some businesses getting fat and greasing the palms of these POS school ‘officials’?! Stealing and wasting tax payer dollars and children’s education dollars. One, the other or both?

It's a serious problem with school funding, when a state (or the federal government in No Child Left Behind, which was based on Texas) can dictate what goes on in local school. It creates these kinds of situations.

However, I bet the company involved with supplying the equipment also donated to the right politicians to as well, who then leaned on the district. That kind of thing happens a lot - homebuilders and grocery store chains donate to politicians who support their pro-illegal alien stances, etc.
97 posted on 10/12/2012 7:15:23 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson