Skip to comments.If You Shoot the Sheriff, You Must Kill Him
Posted on 10/07/2012 4:50:50 AM PDT by Kaslin
San Francisco City Hall's vast machinery went into overdrive after police questioned Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi about a Dec. 31 argument during which he bruised wife Eliana Lopez's right arm. A neighbor videotaped the bruise and later contacted the police. District Attorney George Gascon filed three misdemeanor charges against Mirkarimi for domestic violence battery of his wife, child endangerment (because the couple's son was present) and dissuading a witness (presumably Lopez). San Francisco truly is the city that knows how -- to overreact.
In March, Mirkarimi pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor charge of false imprisonment -- a plea bargain that usually allows law enforcement officers to keep their jobs.
Mayor Ed Lee asked the newly elected sheriff to resign. When Mirkarimi refused, Lee asked the city Ethics Commission to consider "official misconduct" charges against the sheriff and recommend whether the Board of Supervisors should fire him. In August, the ethics panel ruled 4-1 against Mirkarimi. On Tuesday, the supervisors will vote on Mirkarimi's fate. If nine supes vote against him, Mirkarimi will lose his post.
Insiders have trouble naming three supes likely to vote to keep Mirkarimi or conjure a legal excuse to recuse themselves. Any politician savvy enough to win elective office in City Hall probably does not want to anger anti-domestic violence groups.
Besides, to many voters, this issue is a no-brainer; Mirkarimi pleaded guilty. As ethics Commissioner Paul Renne put it, "voters would be shocked if we said a public official who had pleaded guilty to false imprisonment was not guilty of official misconduct."
Under different circumstances, I would expect to make the same arguments myself. ?But the circumstances in this drama demand context. ?To start, Mirkarimi bruised his wife's arm. As far as we know, that's it. I believe that it is possible for a spouse to bruise a spouse's arm without committing domestic violence.
When in doubt, ask the spouse. Lopez testified under oath that her husband never hurt her. She never asked authorities to intervene. She did not want the restraining order that kept the couple apart until it was lifted after seven months.
Advocates for domestic violence victims had contended that victims often lie out of fear, under an abuser's sway or to protect their accusers. But after Lopez, a telenovela actress, took the couple's son for a monthslong hiatus in her native Venezuela, she returned with a fierce (not timid) commitment to resume her marriage despite the system's efforts to break her family apart.
Lee told the San Francisco Chronicle editorial board Thursday that he wishes the Ethics Commission hearings hadn't taken so long. Mirkarimi's lawyers aren't exactly slouches at delaying tactics. But these hearings never would have taken as long as they did had the mayor not thrown in loose charges. The mayor's amended complaint charged that Mirkarimi had told Lopez that he is "powerful," for example, and that Mirkarimi tried to dissuade neighbors from testifying.
Investigators were sent out to investigate these stories. In overcharging Mirkarimi, Lee dumped on the commission the unhappy job of wading through depositions of neighbors, a campaign consultant and even an old Mirkarimi girlfriend. These side charges gave way to an orgy of hearsay and character assassination.
I've heard Mirkarimi critics repeat some of the side charges against Mirkarimi as fact. They should know that after months of investigation, the commissioners found Mirkarimi's official misconduct to consist of bruising his wife's arm, a violation of her personal liberty, and pleading guilty to a criminal charge. The other charges did not stick.
Commission Chairman Benjamin T. Hur dissented. He said that he found Mirkarimi's behavior to be "egregious," but there was no link between his actions and his "official" duties. Indeed, Mirkarimi hadn't even been sworn in as sheriff on New Year's Eve.
At City Hall, there should be a plaque that reads, "The more personal and less official a matter is the more City Hall wants to do something about it."
OK, I’ll be the first to ask....
Is it OK to shoot the deputy?
I shot the sheriff
But I didn’t shoot no deputy, oh no! Oh!
I shot the sheriff
But I didn’t shoot no deputy, ooh, ooh, oo-ooh.)
Yeah! All around in my home town,
They’re tryin’ to track me down;
They say they want to bring me in guilty
For the killing of a deputy,
For the life of a deputy.
But I say:
Oh, now, now. Oh!
(I shot the sheriff.) - the sheriff.
(But I swear it was in selfdefence.)
Oh, no! (Ooh, ooh, oo-oh) Yeah!
I say: I shot the sheriff - Oh, Lord! -
(And they say it is a capital offence.)
Yeah! (Ooh, ooh, oo-oh) Yeah!
Sheriff John Brown always hated me,
For what, I don’t know:
Every time I plant a seed,
He said kill it before it grow -
He said kill them before they grow.
(I shot the sheriff.) Oh, Lord!
(But I swear it was in self-defence.)
Where was the deputy? (Oo-oo-oh)
I say: I shot the sheriff,
But I swear it was in selfdefence. (Oo-oh) Yeah!
Freedom came my way one day
And I started out of town, yeah!
All of a sudden I saw sheriff John Brown
Aiming to shoot me down,
So I shot - I shot - I shot him down and I say:
If I am guilty I will pay.
(I shot the sheriff,)
But I say (But I didn’t shoot no deputy),
I didn’t shoot no deputy (oh, no-oh), oh no!
(I shot the sheriff.) I did!
But I didn’t shoot no deputy. Oh! (Oo-oo-ooh)
Reflexes had got the better of me
And what is to be must be:
Every day the bucket a-go a well,
One day the bottom a-go drop out,
One day the bottom a-go drop out.
I - I - I - I shot the sheriff.
Lord, I didn’t shot the deputy. Yeah!
I - I (shot the sheriff) -
But I didn’t shoot no deputy, yeah! No, yeah!
bottom line.... San francisco is a hell hole
Good people don’t live there.
I think that this woman is a classic case of abused woman—perhaps not ‘beaten up’ physically, but I think Mirkarimi has a hot temper & a big mouth.
Why would she wish to return to Venezuela? Who would?
She is trapped between a rock & a hard place.
I don’t think I would like him for Sheriff of my town.
Methinks the author of the article, Debbie Saunders has the hots for Sheriff Ross. She is like John Roberts of the Supremes bending over backwards, so to speak, to build a case for the indefensible.
Besides hating families, the left absolutely hates the office of sheriff in principle, because it is the one elected local LEO with the legal authority to tell the Feds to go take a hike. The left is trying to get rid of the office of county sheriff entirely, substituting it with "regional policing," supposedly in the interest of saving money in "overlapping jurisdiction" (they're for smaller government you know ;-). Where better to attempt this little gambit than in the city and county of San Francisco? Let's see how far they try to take it.
In all fairness, Ross Mirkarimi is an eco-kook pro-marijuana agitator with no law enforcement experience. While the people of San Francisco think it’s a hoot to make some colorful fruit basket sheriff, it is not just another elective office.
This is a job for somebody who commands para-military LEOs, coordinates with city, state and federal law enforcement, and defends a very important, if stupid, city from crime, terrorism and disaster.
His temporary replacement is a retired police captain who at least knows how to do the job.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.