To: Don Corleone
Anyone who finds that answer reassuring doesn’t understand how much a $trillion really is. Getting efficient won’t close it. Growth won’t close it. Zeroing out the discretionary budget won’t close it.
8 posted on
10/07/2012 7:16:13 AM PDT by
DManA
To: DManA
Anyone who finds that answer reassuring doesnt understand how much a $trillion really is.I'm sure every Obama supporter knows a trillion is a thousand times a billion, or a million times a million, or a thousand times a thousand times a thousand times a thousand.
11 posted on
10/07/2012 7:31:48 AM PDT by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: DManA
DManA....unfortunately you are right...neither party has an answer to the mess they have gotten us into....and America whistles past the graveyard...
Never fear....if not this administration....the next will have to deal with this issue head on....by 2025...according to the CBO....there will be no more discretionary spending.....if the economy grows....and we balance the budget.....we may be able to kick the can down the street for a few more years....but in the end...the check is gonna come do....
12 posted on
10/07/2012 7:32:38 AM PDT by
PigRigger
(Donate to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org - The Troops have our front covered, let's guard their backs!)
To: DManA
DManA....unfortunately you are right...neither party has an answer to the mess they have gotten us into....and America whistles past the graveyard...
Never fear....if not this administration....the next will have to deal with this issue head on....by 2025...according to the CBO....there will be no more discretionary spending.....if the economy grows....and we balance the budget.....we may be able to kick the can down the street for a few more years....but in the end...the check is gonna come due....
13 posted on
10/07/2012 7:33:02 AM PDT by
PigRigger
(Donate to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org - The Troops have our front covered, let's guard their backs!)
To: DManA
US NATIONAL DEBT: currently just over 16 TRILLION dollars!! Thats 16 thousand times a billion!!!!
Current debt per citizen: ~$51,000!!
Current debt per taxpayer: ~$141,000!!!!
US NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK:
(continually updates)
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
14 posted on
10/07/2012 7:33:59 AM PDT by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: DManA
Twice in our histortee have paid off MASSIVE amounts (1/3) in eight years. While below the level of debt- to- GDP. Weave ow, it was still astrono iCal interms of the day. It is possible,and inafairly short time.
16 posted on
10/07/2012 7:57:21 AM PDT by
LS
("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
To: DManA
Yes, but the cuts that are actually necessary are acceptable to no one - so Romney has to nibble. It won’t be enough, but maybe he can buy us a couple of years to finish preparing.
21 posted on
10/07/2012 8:09:23 AM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
(CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
To: DManA
Anyone who finds that answer reassuring doesnt understand how much a $trillion really is. How Big is a Trillion?
In the U.S., one trillion is written as the number "1" followed by 12 zeros (1,000,000,000,000). One year of clock time = (60sec/min) x (60 min/hr) x (24 hr/da) x (365.25 da) = 3.16 x 107 sec
One trillion seconds of ordinary clock time = ( 1012 sec)/( 3.16 x 107 sec/yr) = 31,546 years!
34 posted on
10/07/2012 9:21:30 AM PDT by
thirst4truth
(www.Believer.com)
To: DManA
Anyone who finds that answer reassuring doesnt understand how much a $trillion really is. Getting efficient wont close it. Growth wont close it. Zeroing out the discretionary budget wont close it.
You're right, doing nothing is a much better way. < /sarcasm >
35 posted on
10/07/2012 9:22:01 AM PDT by
lewislynn
( What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in commom? Misinformation)
To: DManA
Two problems with your premise.
1. Kristol is not reassured by this because of the actual policy, he’s reassured because he was on the “Romney’s blowing it badly” bandwagon and he wanted to hear a conservative case other than “The other guy sucks.”
2. If Romney’s only plan was to cut some programs, he wouldn’t have picked Ryan.
43 posted on
10/07/2012 2:56:17 PM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(Reagan @ only 39/Mondale +5/Dukakis +17/McCain +3...panic is unwarranted. So is complacency.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson