Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EggsAckley

If Obama does not want to win, I will agree with you.

I was struck by his seeming indifference to the debate that evening. I see it as one of two things:

1. He knows that there will be no election come Nov 6(All that ammunition was not purchased for nothing).

or

2. The fix is already in. Obama has a computer czar who could have spent the last 4 years figuring out how to have the computer tally more votes for Obama than his challenger regardless of the actual vote count.

Thank God for reynolds wrap.


91 posted on 10/07/2012 8:55:05 PM PDT by Delta Dawn (The whole truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Delta Dawn; EggsAckley; null and void; 2ndDivisionVet
2. The fix is already in. Obama has a computer czar who could have spent the last 4 years figuring out how to have the computer tally more votes for Obama than his challenger regardless of the actual vote count.

People hear on the news about the "drop in unemployment" and look to the right of them and see an unemployed neighbor, to the left of them and see another, in front of them and see food stamps, and there's a reality check.

Kerry/Edwards lost in 2004 and the outcry on the left was that the "Republican-controlled computerized voting" was the culprit. You believe the Dems will come up with a real version of electronic cheating?

People go to the polls and vote for R&R, they compare notes with as many in their network and neighborhood as they can, and see... the MSM news announcing BO as the winner in spite of what actually happened at the polling places. There's another reality check. It won't be a nice one.

95 posted on 10/07/2012 9:03:00 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson