Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Chandler; muir_redwoods

The expression in English is “set foot” not step foot.

That’s racist, you Anglo-centric bigot.

You can use both.


52 posted on 10/08/2012 3:12:17 PM PDT by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: bjorn14
The expression in English is “set foot” not step foot.

That’s racist, you Anglo-centric bigot.

You can use both.

No, one either steps or sets foot. On does not "step" one's foot.

It is an error born of illiteracy. People hear the words incorrectly and if they don't read very much they don't catch the error. Somebody likened it to saying, "for all intensive purposes".

53 posted on 10/08/2012 3:38:30 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Romney vs Obama, Round One: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyNxHOZiQPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: bjorn14

Only if you’re willing to be wrong :).

An alternate accepted usage gets that way because large enough numbers of people make the error until it becomes normal. Foe example, the expression, “under weigh” is also, (but erroneously) spelled “under way”. The correct spelling is related to the expression “to weigh anchor”; the other spelling became accepted due to large numbers of erroneous usages.

It’s all trivial, I agree but a woman who has unnecessarily involved herself with the nations schools at least ought to know the language


55 posted on 10/08/2012 4:06:04 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Hopey changey low emission unicorns and a crap sandwich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson