Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Science Over Politics: Nobel For Adult Stem Cell Work
IBD EDITORIALS ^ | October 8, 2012

Posted on 10/08/2012 4:20:46 PM PDT by raptor22

Bioethics: British and Japanese researchers have been awarded this year's Nobel Prize for showing how to create embryonic stem cells without using human embryos in a genuinely promising line of research.

For decades now, embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) has been trumpeted as the most promising avenue of research, and those who had moral qualms about using human embryos were dismissed as Bible-thumping troglodytes who stood in the way of making the lame walk.

ESCR supporters said their way led to finding "imminent" miracle cures to tragic and sometimes deadly conditions and diseases. They dismissed suggestions of a more promising way with less ethical and moral baggage.

President George W. Bush, the first president to fund embryonic stem cell research, was one who wrestled with the moral qualms and was accused along with others of "politicizing science" for raising concerns about using human embryos created specifically for that purpose.

Federal funding of stem cell research is one of the decisions Bush covers in his book, "Decision Points." On Page 117, he writes: "Embryonic stem cell research seemed to offer so much hope. Yet it raised troubling moral concerns. I wondered if it was possible to find a principled policy that advanced science while respecting the dignity of life."

Well, there is a way, and on Monday two researchers — one British, the other Japanese — were awarded the Nobel Prize for finding it. John Gurdon and Shinya Yamanaka won this year's prize in physiology or medicine for discovering that mature, specialized cells of the body can be reprogrammed into becoming primitive cells that are the equivalent of embryonic stem cells.

In 2006 researchers led by Dr. Yamanaka of Japan's Kyoto University were first able to "reprogram" human skin cells to behave like embryonic stem cells.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: abortion; embryonicstemcells; ibd; ibdprolife; moralabsolutes; prolife

1 posted on 10/08/2012 4:20:53 PM PDT by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: raptor22

wow...how do you leave James Thomson out of the Nobel mix for this same thing?


2 posted on 10/08/2012 4:49:33 PM PDT by stylin19a (Obama -> Ransom "Rance" Stoddard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

And I thought these prizes only went to politically correct winners.


3 posted on 10/08/2012 4:49:47 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Those are the “Peace” prizes. The science prizes are actually legitimate.
4 posted on 10/08/2012 4:55:14 PM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Seems to me that God blessed those who were working to solve the problem, and were honoring His teachings while doing so.


5 posted on 10/08/2012 5:09:09 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
The Nobel Prize Committee must be comprised of total Neanderthals. According to every DemocRat I've ever heard has said that ONLY embryonic cells from aborted fetuses must used and adult stems cells are totally useless. What a bunch of dolts. I bet Nancy Pelosi is pi$$ed beyond belief.
6 posted on 10/08/2012 5:44:42 PM PDT by cashless (Unlike Obama and his supporters, I'd rather be a TEA BAGGER than a TEA BAGGEE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; markomalley; Clairity; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...

Prolife ping


7 posted on 10/08/2012 6:28:42 PM PDT by raptor22 (Join me on Twitter @gerfingerpoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
wow...how do you leave James Thomson out of the Nobel mix

WHO IS JIM THOMPSON?

8 posted on 10/08/2012 6:34:08 PM PDT by bigheadfred (wowza)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The hard science Nobel Prizes have nearly never been PC, to the best of my recollection.

The “Peace Prize” has become a total joke, with only about 20% of those awarded since 1980 being worthy. The Economics Prize is somewhat tainted with PC-dom, but at least 50% of those are reasonable to this day.


9 posted on 10/08/2012 7:41:04 PM PDT by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

What was it that Gore got his prize for? Literary or something?


10 posted on 10/08/2012 7:43:32 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

This is such happy news. God bless these scientists.


11 posted on 10/08/2012 9:59:25 PM PDT by married21 (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred

yikes...sorry, I’m an idiot.

Thomson, who, unfortunately, gave us and promoted embryonic stem cells
, has switched to Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines

http://www.nature.com/stemcells/2008/0808/080814/full/stemcells.2008.118.html

http://www.news.wisc.edu/on-wisconsin/soft-cell/


12 posted on 10/09/2012 5:10:02 AM PDT by stylin19a (Obama -> Ransom "Rance" Stoddard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Algore’s “Nobel Prize” is a perfect example of the current “Nobel Peace Prize”


13 posted on 10/09/2012 6:19:41 AM PDT by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

The left won’t give up on embryonic stem cells, though,

because their goals are different.

The goal is to dehumanize the unborn. Some literally HAVE to dehumanize the unborn, because to do otherwise is to have to confront the fact that they committed the murder of their own child.


14 posted on 10/09/2012 6:26:11 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson