Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wita

What I just heard on FNC was that a balloon he uses to land can’t take winds more than 2 MPH! What? he relies on a flimsy balloon?


34 posted on 10/09/2012 11:33:06 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Red_Devil 232

From everything I know Red, it is the balloon itself that is very thin. The analogy is thinner than a plastic sandwich bag. That doesn’t mean it is weak, but there is so much of it that wind is an issue. The pilot lands with a chute.

Back in the day when the National Geographic balloon was attempting to get off the ground in the 30’s IIRC they were launching from a deep canyon protected from the wind. By the time they hit level ground they would have built up a head of steam so to speak.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratobowl


36 posted on 10/09/2012 5:51:36 PM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Red_Devil 232

The high altitude balloons used are very thin poly plastic of some type. Like a huge bag made from painter’s dropcloth material. The balloon is constructed that way for light weight and expansive ability.

They tried to launch in the early morning when ground wind is lightest but got delayed for some reason. When the thermals started building in late morning, they caused too much wind to allow safe inflation to continue.

Same rules as in the 50’s when Kittinger was making his flights at White Sands Missile Range or the Navy flights in Michigan.


38 posted on 10/10/2012 2:40:35 AM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson