To: SeekAndFind
Not good. Too many games you can play with absentees, like “losing” them from certain precincts or zip codes.
2 posted on
10/09/2012 12:24:48 PM PDT by
DBrow
To: DBrow
Not good. Too many games you can play with absentees, like losing them from certain precincts or zip codes. I agree. one should not use an absentee ballot unless actually unable to go to the polls. Where I vote the ballots are counted as they're put in the slot.
5 posted on
10/09/2012 12:29:26 PM PDT by
luvbach1
(Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
To: DBrow
I already voted here in Iowa. A little worried that shenanigans could be played but was impressed with the system after the experience.
7 posted on
10/09/2012 12:39:17 PM PDT by
cornfedcowboy
(Trust in God, but empty the clip.)
To: DBrow
Early in-person voting is the way to go, but I would not vote a written absentee ballot unless absolutely necessary. They can be invalidated for a host of reasons.
The Reps are finally waking up re early voting. The Dems have been killing us in this area. It is a way to get out your vote and not depend on people showing up on election day. There could be bad weather, illness, emergencies that require one to be out of town, and just plain laziness. We should all be encouraging early in-person voting.
10 posted on
10/09/2012 12:57:17 PM PDT by
kabar
To: DBrow
Au contraire. Very, very good. Obama is toast with these numbers. And I don't care how often someone posts the little article about "losing" absentees, if you have a R Governor and Sec State, that stuff doesn't happen much.
Very, very good news.
11 posted on
10/09/2012 1:05:02 PM PDT by
LS
("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson