Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stacey Dash on Romney: ‘I Chose Him Not By the Color of His Skin But the Content of His Character’
CNN via NewsBusters.org ^ | Noel Sheppard

Posted on 10/09/2012 7:37:57 PM PDT by RatherBiased.com

As NewsBusters reported Monday, African-American actress Stacey Dash was thoroughly lambasted on Twitter for expressing her support for Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney.

During an interview with CNN's Piers Morgan Tuesday, a defiant Dash marvelously said, "I chose him not by the color of his skin but the content of his character" (video follows with transcribed highlights):

STACEY DASH: I just feel that as a country, this is my choice. This is the man I want to lead my country. It is my right as an American citizen. It’s my Constitutional right to have my choice of who I want to vote for for President. And I chose him not by the color of his skin but the content of his character. 

PIERS MORGAN, HOST: Have you heard from Mitt Romney at all?

DASH: Yes, well not Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan.

MORGAN: Paul Ryan rang you today?

DASH: Yes, he did.

MORGAN: What did he say?

DASH: He said, “Thank you so much for your support,” and that I was brave, and they support me, and I thought that was so generous and kind. You know? Lovely. Really

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: staceydash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: Windflier

and that makes it okay? because its become ‘average’?


41 posted on 10/10/2012 12:58:46 AM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Just because I googled her name?

seriously?

You are the one defending it, remember. You argue like a leftist. Accuse those you don’t agree with of being what they oppose.

shameless.


42 posted on 10/10/2012 1:00:22 AM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
and that makes it okay? because its become ‘average’?

What on earth are you talking about? Are you a full grown man, or are you a grossed out pre-pubescent boy?

Never mind. Get with your mother and have her explain the birds and the bees to you.

43 posted on 10/10/2012 1:51:19 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

All Ms. Dash was doing is simply putting to work what one Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said so many years ago that safe to say, the liberals have FORGOTTEN, about the “content of one’s character.”


44 posted on 10/10/2012 3:32:48 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

...and I want to marry her by the content of her hotness! Conservative, beautiful, and in her 40s...move over guys,s he is mine!


45 posted on 10/10/2012 7:04:47 AM PDT by RochesterNYconservative (ROMNEY/RYAN 20121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

I shouldn’t have said what I said and will never have said it again. But an iPhone 6 would buy my vote in the state where the Communist will win no matter how I vote.


46 posted on 10/10/2012 8:51:03 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; supremedoctrine; GnL; MNJohnnie; Irish Eyes; mplsconservative; Flycatcher; ...
I'm curious as to why you only replied to me and not anyone else who posted to you?

Just because I googled her name?

I was thinking more about the list of cable shows you mentioned a couple of weeks ago describing all of their objectionable content in detail. I had never even heard the titles of any of them. Then there were all the posts you had pulled on the Japan Tsunami threads.

You are the one defending it, remember.

What post do you see that in?

47 posted on 10/10/2012 11:39:00 AM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson