[LS]

I predicted this last week: Obama, having had so much criticism for not being aggressive enough and "too nice," will be angry, aggressive, breathing fire . . . in a foreign policy debate, where people want to see a calm, resolve, sober approach. If I didn't know better I'd say Romney set him up with a body blow for the haymaker.

Worse for Zero, this is a townhall where people are not going to want an angry aggressive person talking to them.

[stephenjohnbanker]

” I predicted this last week: Obama, having had so much criticism for not being aggressive enough and “too nice,” will be angry, aggressive, breathing fire . . . in a foreign policy debate, where people want to see a calm, resolve, sober approach. If I didn’t know better I’d say Romney set him up with a body blow for the haymaker. “

I stated this (almost verbatim) to a pal last night.

[Lee'sGhost]

Yes. I was telling folks last week that Obama supporters what him to hit back harder. What that (should) mean is that he pummels Romney with more and “better” facts. What I maintain is that Obama doesn’t have the ability to do that because his policies suck (can use those) and his “facts” are lies that Romney will obliterate.

So the only “harder” hits Zero has is to speak with an angry, louder voice. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE let him do that. If he does, he will come across as an angry bully with no substance...which is all he really is.

In short, he only has two choices, wimp out again, or play to his true angry empty self. He can NOT win with substance because he has none. Period.

[Tex-Con-Man]

My prediction was that Obama would overcorrect...and it wouldn't be helpful.