Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude
I suppose it's that he implied he doesn't believe the function of a woman's body is unaffected by external stress.

Sounds like an eminently reasonable position to me, but all I hear is that it was "offensive to women."

I know various functions of a man's body are demonstrably affected by external stress; maybe women's bodies ARE different after all.

73 posted on 10/15/2012 8:18:50 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass (So?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Trailerpark Badass

We do know that a woman’s intensity of response to a man most definitely does play into the likelihood of conception.

Why wouldn’t the converse be true, then?


77 posted on 10/15/2012 8:28:00 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson