[longtermmemmory]

these anti-bully campaigns are more or less anti-male campaigns.

Essentially they are intended to sissify society into a bunch of nany state crybabies who go running to the government for a free phone to call for help from Her-sister.

[New Perspective]

these anti-bully campaigns are more or less anti-male campaigns. Essentially they are intended to sissify society into a bunch of nany state crybabies who go running to the government for a free phone to call for help from Her-sister.

So a kid who is being bullied who wants it to stop and tries to use proper channels without physical altercation is a sissy? Not every kid likes to fight.

[wolficatZ]

You didn’t read the article, I bet.

[Gabz]

these anti-bully campaigns are more or less anti-male campaigns.

What nonsense. If they are anti-anything - they are anti white. It is rare that a black kid who bullies a white kid gets the same punishment that the white kid will get, and the truth of the matter is the white kid will more often be punished for defending him/herself from the black bully.

Some of the worst bullies in schools are girls and that was even true back in the 60s and 70s when I was in school - and I attended private, not public schools.

[SoldierDad]

These so-called “anti-bully” campaigns aren't aimed at bullying behavior. They are aimed at any behavior which makes any student “feel” bad. Today mild teasing is considered bullying. While I agree that student misbehavior at all levels should be addressed, calling all such behavior bullying is ridicules. All this is doing is making schools institute zero tolerance actions (suspensions/expulsions) against students unnecessarily.