It would certainly be beneficial if the long guns did not have serial numbers, but nearly all long guns have been required to have serial numbers since 1968. I would love to see Canadian manufacturers stop putting serial numbers on long guns, but it seems very unlikely, as they are requred to be sold in the United States, which is about 80% of the market.
The big advantage of not haveing serial numbers is, as said in the article, the prevention of a registry. No serial numbers, no registry. As the registry has proved to be an enormous waste of resources, and virtually no violent crimes have been solved with the registry, this would be a very good thing.
1 posted on
10/16/2012 4:29:23 PM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain; Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...
Canada Ping!
2 posted on
10/16/2012 4:33:23 PM PDT by
Squawk 8888
(True North- Strong Leader, Strong Dollar, Strong and Free!)
To: marktwain
Who knew?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Firearms_manufacturers_in_Canada
3 posted on
10/16/2012 4:34:37 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: marktwain
Without a serial number, a stolen gun could not be found, nor could it be insured.
4 posted on
10/16/2012 4:37:37 PM PDT by
Gertie
To: marktwain
From the comments of a couple of ex-Canadian troops now in the states, I get the impression quite a few C1A1s, Inglis Hi-Powers and other military toys “escaped” custody and are now ensconced in basements and attics all over Canada. :-D
7 posted on
10/16/2012 5:31:16 PM PDT by
M1903A1
("We shed all that is good and virtuous for that which is shoddy and sleazy... and call it progress")
To: marktwain
How long before all guns will have a tracking device similar to cell phones that would triangulate your position.
8 posted on
10/16/2012 6:49:13 PM PDT by
soupbone1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson