Interesting that all those posters saying how great a job Cowley did in the second debate thread are absent from this thread...
What ever became of EXCELLENCE in American choices/decisions?
Ask why the most popular man in mass media is never considered as a moderator? Rush Limbaugh would keep the focus on the real issues and hold the feet to the fire.
Watching it unfold on live TV it did not seem right. It was awkwardly and comfortably scripted, and too smooth in execution. But watching it on replay the agenda filled manipulation was obvious. It appears Candy Crowley and CNN together with the Obama Administration scripted the Libyan injection into the Presidential Debate.I’m not just talking about Candy Crowley interjecting on behalf of President Obama, and interrupting Mitt Romney, I mean the whole segment was a set up. So we did a little research:
Candy Crowley told Erin Burnett on CNN’s show Out Front, Monday Night 10/15, that she had collected the questions from the invited and vetted debate audience at Hofstra University and was reviewing them. This was Monday on the 7pm broadcast of Erin Burnett.
When the question on Libya was asked by audience member Kerry Ladka, he prefaced the question by saying:
….this question actually comes from my, err, um, a brain trust of my friends at Global Telecom Supply in Mineola yesterday, we were sitting around talking about Libya…
If Candy Crowley already had the audience questions assembled the day before, how could Kerry Ladka and his brain trust friends have been writing one?
How was last night’s “debate” like Halloween?
They both feature Candy & Creepy Crowleys...
Romney was in the process of setting Obama up on the terror call on Lybia. He was making sure he had it down that Obama was on record as calling it terrorism initially, by his own admission, and then was going to absolutely ream him on the following two weeks of a changed story when the UN Ambassador went out, when Obama himself went out, when Hillary went out, Jake Harney and so many others and insisted that it was because of that video...and then ask him simply, why?
Why did you change your story, Mr. President? Why did you mislead and lie to the American people for two weeks? Could it have been political? It sure looks like it to the rest of us.
It would have been a great stroke...but the moderator derailed it. That’s what really happened there. But it will all come out now as people are talking about it everywhere and they cannot hide from it. Monday will set it straight again.
The most disrespectful VP Debate in History
http://www.jeffhead.com/vpdebate.htm
I know this post does nothing to add to the conversation but I just need to vent: THAT PISSED ME OFF! I am so disgusted by the media this go around. She lied and gave the debate to O. Even we Romney backers knew it was an ugly moment when it happened and it turned it Obama’s way...with clapping led by Michelle. Damnit!
Ok, done.
Yes, she’s there to be a moderator and not debtor. Audience cheered - proofed they chose their audience. Her actions plus the audience cheering exposed the socialist agenda. Romney was in enemy territory when it should be impartial. The GOP must speak of this!
” Romney’s broader point is accurate — that it took the administration days to concede that the assault on the U.S. mission in Benghazi was an “act of terrorism” that appears unrelated to initial reports of anger at a video that defamed the prophet Muhammad. (The reporting is contradictory on whether there was indeed a demonstration outside the mission.) By our count, it took eight days for an administration official to concede that the deaths in Libya were the result of a “terrorist attack.” “ http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/fact-checking-the-second-presidential-debate/2012/10/17/d6d3a7b4-17a3-11e2-a55c-39408fbe6a4b_blog.html
Yeah. Romney had to debate both Jabba, The Hut and the Odongo at the same time with one hand tied behind his back. At the worst, it came out a tie, maybe even a win.
To protect obama was her job.
It outed Candy once and for all, and for all to see.
But there was something else too. Something that hasn't been commented on enough.
Did you notice how when Crowley jumped to Bammy’s defense the crowd cheered her, long and loud?
Yes, that's right. This supposedly neutral crowd of undecided voters cheered an outrageous display of partisanship.
So the crowd managed to out themselves too. They weren't neutral or undecided. The whole audience revealed themselves to be stuffed with 0bama plants, and the Presidential Commission on Debates and Gallup, who participated in and endorsed this disgusting fraud, showed themselves to be in on the corruption as well.
And does anyone think that her scheduling of the last question, the one about the 47% that Romney somehow didn’t get a chance to refute, was an accident? It was blatant and deliberately planned leftist bias! Romney’s debate negotiators had damned well better make a better deal for the next one, considering how miserably they failed on this one.