“.................Responding to Crowley’s intervention, Obama said: ‘Candy, could you say that a little louder?’ That tense moment saw the audience burst into a round of applause - despite rules meant to restrict any displays of partisanship from the crowd.....”
“.................Responding to Crowley’s intervention, Obama said: ‘Candy, could you say that a little louder?’ That tense moment saw the audience burst into a round of applause - despite rules meant to restrict any displays of partisanship from the crowd.....”
I was really wondering about the choice of questions..Thought they were odd during this time of grave problems threatening to destroy us and found it interesting that Megan Kelly of FOXNEWS, called attention to the strange questions almost immediately after the debate was over. She noticed, too. Crowley chose those questions to satisfy her passion for Obama. The other thing I wonder about is whether Obama received the questions in advance. Is that possible?
I watched this debate in a room of 200 well-informed Republicans. When Obama uttered his lie about the Rose Garden, the room exploded in outrage. The tumult was so great that I didn’t hear Crowley’s traitorous lying defense of Obama, and when the noise died down, I heard the applause and didn’t realize what it was for. Drudge and FR had to clear that up.
What I said would happen happened. Don’t mean to say I told ya, but I knew that somehow a lie would be told and not contradicted (in fact it was corroborated), and the lie would live on in the memories of about 50 million people who do not bother with follow-ups on the debate.
This is a standard dirty trick of the Dems. Barack did it right before the 2008 election on the issue of the live birth (”failed” abortion) law in Illinois. No time to refute the lie before the vote.
Somehow this nonsense has got to be stopped. It is a threat to the Republic.