Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kearnyirish2
That is a good point. I know the numbers coincidentally went down at quite the opportune time for Obama but not sure if it is necessary to replace with underemployed because at least 1/2 of Americans know they are crap numbers.
12 posted on 10/18/2012 3:23:39 AM PDT by napscoordinator (GOP Candidate 2020 - "Bloomberg 2020 - We vote for whatever crap the GOP puts in front of us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: napscoordinator

The scale of the underemployment is certainly newsworthy; for example, here in the NYC metro area we have lost thousands of financial sector jobs to India and the Philippines that frankly will never come back. People who thought they had careers in those fields are fleeing the high costs of the area (which were only tolerable because of decent pay before); the number of foreclosures is climbing as the backlog has been cleared and people are again having their homes sold by the banks holding their mortgages. I know 2 computer programmers who were looking for work as cab drivers and security for supermarkets; this is what we’ve been reduced to.

“Underemployment” is necessary to recognize the financial disaster being visited on a huge number of American families.


13 posted on 10/18/2012 3:32:32 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson