Replies

There were several interesting things that happened before and after Gov. Romney confronted Obama about his claim that he called the Benghazi attack a “terrorist attack” the next day.

I like almost everyone else in the country who had been following the developments for the past month was as shocked as Gov. Romney when Obama made such an easily disprovable claim.

Then when Obama persisted and told the moderator to “look at the transcript” and she held up a piece of paper like she had some sort of proof... it looked like some sort of collusion had taken place.

Then when the audience applauded when she sided with Obama and told Gov. Romney that he was wrong... it sounded like the audience wasn't so “undecided” after all. Apparently even the “first lady” was clapping and cheering.

Yet everyone watching at home who had been following this at all knew that it was an incredibly blatant lie, and that this was some sort of far bizarre trap that had been set which could only work with premeditated support and collusion from the moderator. I didn't think that it would fly even at MSNBC but when I watched some of their commentators after the debate they were going along with this farce... it was incredible to say the least.

While this disgusting rewrite of history now is quite popular among Obama’s base and has created some sort of unexplainable new narrative. It was obviously all part of a premeditated, malicious and intentionally misleading scheme. I doubt that it will actually be helpful in the least. Candy and whoever orchestrated this travesty including the president deserve some sort of punishment for cheating.