Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SDShack

Were Bush Hitler posters put up in her neighborhood?

No sympathy for her?

As a child of two Holocaust survivors, I find your attitude reprehensible.

Whether it’s Obama, Bush or anyone else, I applaud this woman’s actions and deplore the idea of some who would paint someone out as Hitler.

Believing otherwise makes you scum in my book.


13 posted on 10/18/2012 11:50:29 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: sakic
This is America.

People have a First Amendment right to own and display offensive posters.

It is a crime to steal someone else's property.

Your parentage or her life experiences do not confer on you or on her the authority to infringe on anyone else's constitutional rights or to steal anyone else's property.

19 posted on 10/18/2012 12:03:45 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: sakic

Madame, like it or not, and personally I don’t, but there is such as thing as ‘’free speech’’.


22 posted on 10/18/2012 12:07:05 PM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: sakic
Whether it’s Obama, Bush or anyone else, I applaud this woman’s actions and deplore the idea of some who would paint someone out as Hitler.

Obama is very much like Hitler and the posters are serving as an effective warning.

Besides, it appears she was outraged because bambi was portrayed as Hitler - not that there was a portrayal.

Note she said:

"I just got very angry that they would do that to "Obamas image".

Rather than:

"I just got very angry that they would do that to any candidates image".

Regardless, what she did was illegal and age is not an excuse if she is of sound mind.

23 posted on 10/18/2012 12:09:55 PM PDT by KittenClaws (You may have to fight a battle more than once in order to win it." - Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: sakic
I find your attitude reprehensible.

As I do yours. The first amendment exists precisely to protect political speech that someone may deem to be offensive. Otherwise, it wouldn't be necessary.

I guess you don't see the irony when you condone some of the same actions and attitudes that helped Hitler and his minions rise to power.
24 posted on 10/18/2012 12:10:12 PM PDT by chrisser (Starve the Monkeys!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: sakic

I don’t condone the posters, but I support the right of citizens to speak out. It’s called free speech. By applauding the actions of someone to remove political free speech that you find offensive, are you not behaving the same way the Nazi’s did? Censorship is wrong and should not be applauded.
BTW, George Soros was a Nazi Collaborator in WWII, and is also a major supporter of 0bama. Do you find Soros reprehensible, and by extension, do you find 0bama reprehensible for taking money from George Soros, a Nazi Collaborator?
And for the record, my father fought against the Nazi’s in WWII. In other words, he fought to save your parents.


41 posted on 10/18/2012 1:47:02 PM PDT by SDShack (0zer0care = "The Final Solution" - Socialized Euthanasia Healthcare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson