Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robowombat

The author is misleading at best, and wrong at worst, regarding Mad Mo as the onyl founder of a religion mentioned in a “contemporary source” - whatever her actual definition of “contemporary” is - either by a specific date range, or merely a secular source, or a source not of the religious founders’ own religion.

Jesus Christ is mentioned in the works of Josephus, a jewish historian, not a Christian. Also in the writings of the Roman senator Tacitus is Christ mentioned being crucified under Pontius Pilate.

http://www.ucg.org/booklet/jesus-christ-real-story/did-jesus-really-die-and-live-again/do-other-nonbiblical-sources-con/


11 posted on 10/19/2012 2:20:32 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Secret Agent Man
There are some question as to whether Josephus’ comments on Jesus are later interpolations. The Old Church Slavonic comments are more questionable. If legitimate the commentary in Josephus would rate as a contemporary source for certain.
14 posted on 10/19/2012 2:25:27 PM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson