Why was it necessary for her to make this statement? Who would even question that she or Obama would have anything to do with making the video?
Obama said on Letterman the film was made by somebody that lives here, sort of a shadowy character and we denounced it and the US government had nothing to do with it. Is the film maker even an American citizen?
Why all the need to repeatedly promote and advertise this video? Yes, I know they do not want to discuss their deliberate neglect, but why would anyone think they president and secretary of state had anything to do with that film?
And consider the fact that on Youtube there are 1000s if not hundreds of 1000s of anti-islamic movies that could be considered a million times more offensive and they’ve been up for years. And all of a sudden this one particular video is singled out? The fact is it was all an excuse by the Islamo Nazis and the Islamo Marxist in the WH.
Somebody tipped off the ME talkshow mullah about that video trailer, apparently when it was languishing with 10 YouTube views. My guess would be that in her denial, she was communicating with some distant friendly not to expose how the ME came to learn of the video's existence.
Administration complicity in informing the ME about the video becoming known could awaken a political firestorm, but yet another layer atop that (affixing tin foil hat) would be if someone in the administration actually caused either 1) the video to be made or 2) caused someone to dub an existing video with "more provocative" dialog to color the production for just such a nefarious purpose. The original actors claim there was nothing in an original version that had reasonable cause to end lame Islam.
Ok, Hillary does have a tin ear, so many will say that's her excuse, but I've seen time and again that not even conniving attorneys come close to the deviousness of an avowed Alinskyite, as Hillary certainly has been for most of her life.
HF