Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Head
Why does Hillary say “Let me state very clearly, and I hope it is obvious, that the United States government had absolutely nothing to do with this video,” Clinton said at a press conference in Washington.

Why was it necessary for her to make this statement? Who would even question that she or Obama would have anything to do with making the video?

Obama said on Letterman the film was made by somebody that lives here, sort of a shadowy character and we denounced it and the US government had nothing to do with it. Is the film maker even an American citizen?

Why all the need to repeatedly promote and advertise this video? Yes, I know they do not want to discuss their deliberate neglect, but why would anyone think they president and secretary of state had anything to do with that film?

23 posted on 10/19/2012 10:55:26 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Please help Todd Akin defeat Claire and the GOP-e send money!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts
Hillbilly repeated that publically several times. 0bama repeated that same bizarre denial at the UN. Watch from 1:17 - 1:34 on this video.

U.S. President Speaks to U.N. About YouTube Video

25 posted on 10/19/2012 11:15:42 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Just mythoughts

And consider the fact that on Youtube there are 1000s if not hundreds of 1000s of anti-islamic movies that could be considered a million times more offensive and they’ve been up for years. And all of a sudden this one particular video is singled out? The fact is it was all an excuse by the Islamo Nazis and the Islamo Marxist in the WH.


29 posted on 10/19/2012 11:29:00 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Someday our schools we will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Just mythoughts
"She doth protest too much!" has for centuries been shorthand for her giving a strong clue that she was complicit by making a forceful, unnecessary or seemingly out of place denial, in something she obviously claimed the administration was not complicit.

Somebody tipped off the ME talkshow mullah about that video trailer, apparently when it was languishing with 10 YouTube views. My guess would be that in her denial, she was communicating with some distant friendly not to expose how the ME came to learn of the video's existence.

Administration complicity in informing the ME about the video becoming known could awaken a political firestorm, but yet another layer atop that (affixing tin foil hat) would be if someone in the administration actually caused either 1) the video to be made or 2) caused someone to dub an existing video with "more provocative" dialog to color the production for just such a nefarious purpose. The original actors claim there was nothing in an original version that had reasonable cause to end lame Islam.

Ok, Hillary does have a tin ear, so many will say that's her excuse, but I've seen time and again that not even conniving attorneys come close to the deviousness of an avowed Alinskyite, as Hillary certainly has been for most of her life.

HF

53 posted on 10/20/2012 8:37:04 AM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson