It’s a matter of gross negligence. Negligence kills.
This is way too long. Better to let this kind of detail play out in the public square.
That’s not to say Benghazi does not deserve attention at the debate, just not the kind of comprehensive attention you propose. Something pithier and directly accusatory of administration incompetence. I’d focus on the withdrawal of the security attachment in the days leading up to the attack, despite pleas that the security not be withdrawn.
Mitt needs to ask the follow up question:Why do you call the Ft Hood shooting
"workplace violence" and not TERRORISM" ??
You may have good points to put forward in a speech... but, in a debate — you must be simple and clear. Make things complicated and you just confuse people.