Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RushingWater

YAY!!!!
Go SoCal!

We would VERY MUCH LIKE TO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT WE ARE EATING!!

As California goes, especially in this case...so goes the Country!

F**k Michael Taylor !
Head of the FDA and Former scumbag DEM contibutor from scum sucking virus/fungal/bacteria producing MONSANTO seed!

Did I make myself clear?

These are EVIL people!


2 posted on 10/21/2012 8:12:04 PM PDT by acapesket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: acapesket

Vote Yes on 37


14 posted on 10/21/2012 9:30:05 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: acapesket

Michael Taylorr is the head of the FDA? News to the rest of us.


29 posted on 10/21/2012 10:19:35 PM PDT by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: acapesket
I'm so tired of you idiots thinking that all GMOs are eeevil frankenfoods.

Let me give you an example of a benign GMO product: One can now buy stone fruit and pomme fruit trees that bear virtually any month of the summer you wish. One can even get grafted trees that have three to four bearings on them such that you have fresh fruit most all the time without too much fruit at any one time. It reduces the load on the tree too. Control of and spreading out time of harvest is very important to farmers, who can then arrange their production in such a way that averages out the price they get. It means you get locally grown food for a longer time period. It also reduces their risk that a weather anomaly will take out the entire crop.

The only purpose for the modification was date of harvest; the fruit itself is absolutely NO DIFFERENT. The only reason they use recombinant technology to produce these trees is that it is cheap, accurate, and reliable compared to classic hybridization. Do you really want to punish those people because you are so terrified of Monsanto that you don't have a clue about what is or is not healthful about a particular modification? Why not subscribe to a service you trust to make those determinations if you are so worried about it?

Look at what Prop 65 did re cancer causing chemicals. The labels are everywhere to the point that they are meaningless. Did it work?

46 posted on 10/21/2012 10:44:19 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Islam offers us choices: convert or kill, submit or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: acapesket
Prop 37 is a definite no for me. Written by trial lawyer who is notorious for suing small business under ADA... backed and most likely funded by left wing wackos. Surprised to see conservatives supporting nanny state regulations that will only serve to destroy what is left of family farms here in California.

http://www.noprop37.com/videos/ask-a-farmer/?fb_action_ids=4138543974962&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582

244 posted on 10/28/2012 7:22:16 PM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson