The chem weapon story (which I fully conceed is true) has been planted in the minds of the public —a sturdy conceptual platform exists.
Obama will use that by staging some event, say, a mooost unforrrrtunate use of chem weapons by naaaasty pro-Assad guys. Who are actualy Obama’s guys. Or maybe they shell Turkey from Syrian territory.
This compels NATO intervention, or at the very least touches off a highly visible and headline-catching war.
Which requires the full vigor of an internationally-minded US Prez.
The leader with a proven track record of doing ANYTHING no matter dastardly to win is our own Prez, and increasingly his view is that his electoral goose is already cooked.
Look for the man to do ANYTHING.
Obammy has set the stage over there now. He shifted power over to the Muslim Brotherhood and they are radical jihadists. No matter who is president, the world is screwed now if they depend on anything peaceful and sane occuring in the Middle East. It’s going to be war, war, war now.
I don’t agree that Obama is going to try and cancle the election in the name of war. But I agree there will be never ending war over there now that jihadists control Iran, Egypt, Iraq and Libya...and soon Syria. Then, they use their power to take over Jordan and Saudi Arabia. It is set into motion and no one is stopping it.
If Obama wins, we take a position of supporting the jihadists from “behind” to take over Syria, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. If Romney wins, he’ll try to prolong the take over of Jordan and Saudi Arabia. Syria is gone.