Obama HAS undermined Constitutional checks and balances via his czars and regulators within HHS, EPA, the Justice Dept. negligence, and numerous other abuses.
Saying that “the legislative side can bring this back under control” is simply ignoring the reality of what is actually happening.
Obama is destroying the American economy by expanding our indebtedness, while crushing the private sector.
You demonstrate a complete misunderstanding of the consequences of letting the banks fail, which isn’t surprising given your opposition to free trade.
The Federal Reserve didn’t “provide liquidity to the markets”, they printed money we don’t have and mortgaged our future in the process.
Your “on the other hand” examples are precisely the proof of his ill intent for the economy.
Obama IS setting the stage for UN Control! Did you notice who will monitoring our elections? Are you aware of his current efforts to support a UN tax on all of us? Did you happen to notice Obama’s support for the UN imposing gun control on U.S. citizens?
How is it that you don’t consider cutting the Military budget by $1 Trillion “decimating our military”???
And where did you get the notion that the fiscal cliff was a Republican objective?
How do you suppose he would use our military against us? Do you really think members of the military would just blindly follow orders to attack America citizens?
Perhaps you hadn’t noticed that opposing voter I.D. IS “undermining free elections”?
He HAS taken over industries, or hadn’t you noticed that he won’t allow G.M. to buy back shares from the government, or that he has strong armed the banks to withhold loans. He’s shutting down the coal industry, chasing oil rigs from our coasts, fighting fracking, and any other realistic and productive energy sources.
Obama clearly stated at the close of the last election than his goal was to Fundamentally Transform America, which is why I have it in quotes!
It's hard to say that the czars aren't really within the perogative of the Executive. He would have been wiser not to call them czars. But I'm pretty sure the President could always create an office within a department and assign them a special task. More concerning than the creation of the offices is the people Obama staffed them with.
Obama is destroying the American economy by expanding our indebtedness, while crushing the private sector. You demonstrate a complete misunderstanding of the consequences of letting the banks fail, which isnt surprising given your opposition to free trade.
It is free trade which is crushing the private sector. We are letting any and every third world country with excess labor take our jobs away.
Letting some banks fail is fine. Letting banks fail in mass leads to a very deep depression.
Wasn't it a republican controlled House that agreed to this sequestration nightmare? We had the purse strings and this is what we came up with. Were they thinking this would embarrass the Democrats?
The truth is we probably do need to cut the military some, but only after assuring that we have a super strong military. We just fought two wars which drove the military expense up. Why do we need to keep it at that level indefinitely? President Bush kept the war costs separate from the normal budget, so that we would be able to scale back down after the wars were over. Obama folded them into the budget so that it would be harder to cut. Again, I'm for a super strong military, but it's time to ask what do we need and what are we getting for that increased level of funding.