To: fso301
Problem is, the two countries don't border each other. While its not implausible to think of traffic slipping through northern Iraq or southern Turkey, that really can't account for a strategic corridor.
8 posted on
10/23/2012 9:29:49 AM PDT by
kevkrom
(If a wise man has an argument with a foolish man, the fool only rages or laughs...)
To: kevkrom
Corridors is as corridors does.
9 posted on
10/23/2012 9:31:45 AM PDT by
Genoa
(Starve the beast.)
To: kevkrom
Problem is, the two countries don't border each other. While its not implausible to think of traffic slipping through northern Iraq or southern Turkey, that really can't account for a strategic corridor. From a real estate standpoint, if you want to acquire a large parcel, you may have to purchase discontiguous parcels and piece them together.
In the Middle East, with a defenseless Iraq rapidly becoming an Iranian vassal, things are going Iran's way. A contiguous land corridor from Iran to the Mediterranean Sea is just a matter of time.
18 posted on
10/23/2012 10:02:25 AM PDT by
fso301
To: kevkrom
Iran flies through Iraqi airspace to Syria for what that is worth.
29 posted on
10/23/2012 10:34:54 AM PDT by
rushmom
To: kevkrom
Yeah, Iran has shown such respect for Iraq’s borders.
To: kevkrom
If you re-establish order in Syria, Iranian planes have no allied airports to land planes. Iran could fly over an ever-increasingly chaotic Iraq, but the major point is, confine Iran so that it has pretty much nowhere to go.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson