Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobertClark
I don't think this will get unsealed, and if it does it won't be damaging, but I must disagree with you on this:

No judge in their right or wrong mind would entertain a motion to unseal the testimony. The real victims here could be the couple’s children, as they begin to learn the tawdry and unsettling details of their parent’s divorce.

If someone had told me in 2004 that a guy would be President of the United States because a family court judge ignored the welfare of a young boy and unsealed he-said/she-said testimony about the parents going to sex clubs, I would have called that nuts.

143 posted on 10/24/2012 7:43:08 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Reagan @ only 39/Mondale +5/Dukakis +17/McCain +3...panic is unwarranted. So is complacency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Silverback

Very true.

http://hillbuzz.org/question-why-did-jack-ryan-drop-out-of-illinois-senate-race-in-2004-which-paved-the-way-for-obamas-rise-89310


155 posted on 10/24/2012 7:57:21 AM PDT by COUNTrecount (What Clint Said !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson